【24h】

Privatising land in England

机译:英格兰的私有化土地

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - This paper aims to analyse the extent to which privatising - or denationalising land - has legal and policy effects. Design/methodology/approach - It applies the law in context scholarship to the question of land privatisation. Findings - Of all the recent privatisations in England, the most valuable, and yet least recorded, is of land. According to one estimate, two million hectares or 10 per cent of the Britain landmass, left the public sector for private ownership between 1979 and 2018. Privatisations include land that is sold, leased or where a public body changes its status. This paper aims to explore these privatisations, considering them as denationalisations, concluding that the effects are most significant in housing where the differences between social and private renting in relation to rents, the security of tenure and housing quality are striking. Moreover, although other public law restraints on the state-owned property are often limited, they are also still significant, facilitating scrutiny, particularly in combination with the public sector equality duty or site-specific duties for libraries, allotments or playing fields. All the sites disposed of to private developers, landlords and companies have lost these protections. Originality/value - This is the first time this question has been considered in this way from a legal perspective.
机译:目的 - 本文旨在分析私有化或卫生土地的程度 - 具有法律和政策影响。设计/方法/方法 - 将法律应用于背景奖学金中的土地私有化问题。调查结果 - 在英格兰最近的所有私有化中,最有价值的,最不记录的是土地。根据一个估计,2000百万公顷或10%的英国土地,离开了1979年至2018年间私人所有权的公共部门。私有化包括销售,租赁或公共机构改变其地位的土地。本文旨在探讨这些私有化,将这些私有化视为反应,得出结论认为,这些效果在住房中最重要的是,社会和私人租赁与租金之间的差异,保管和住房质量的安全性令人惊叹。此外,虽然其他公共法律限制在国有财产上往往是有限的,但它们也仍然很重要,促进审查,特别是与图书馆,分配或竞争领域的公共部门平等税或现场特定职责相结合。所有出售给私营开发商,房东和公司的网站都失去了这些保护。原创性/价值 - 这是第一次从法律角度以这种方式考虑这个问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号