首页> 外文期刊>International journal of intelligence and counter intelligence >Combatting Terrorism Through Fusion Centers: Useful Lessons From Other Experiences?
【24h】

Combatting Terrorism Through Fusion Centers: Useful Lessons From Other Experiences?

机译:通过融合中心打击恐怖主义:其他经验的有用教训?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

European nations might consider an institutional option in their ongoing fight against terrorism. Research on intelligence reform globally indicates that certain institutional innovations to combating terrorism that may not have been seriously considered by decisionmakers in some European countries. International news reporting on the effectiveness of the intelligence services and the police in France, and even more so in Belgium, has been extremely negative. The New York Times during the Spring of 2016, following the attacks by Islamic State (IS/ISIS) on 22 March, which killed at least 32 people and injured more than 300 at the international airport and in the center of Brussels, published a series of articles demonstrating the weakness of Belgian intelligence. Its editorial of 12 April was titled "Europe's Urgent Security Challenge," and an article in The Economist of 2 April 2016 was titled "No Poirots: Belgian Police are Flummoxed by IS." What is more, most scholarly work remains extremely pessimistic about the potential for developing more effective intelligence against terrorism. Not surprisingly, intelligence and counterintelligence are topics of primary concern of the European Union (EU) and its member states. While a great deal has been published about intelligence failures, the literature on intelligence successes is rather meager. While keeping a fundamental consideration in mind, as captured in the following statement: "Those who know don't say, and those who say don't know," ample evidence is available to suggest that the intelligence agencies may not be up to the demands posed by the current terrorist threat promoted by DAESH/IS/ISIS. The attacks in San Bernardino, California, on 2 December 2015 in which 14 people were killed and 22 seriously injured, and in Orlando, Florida, on 12 June 2016 in which 49 people were killed and 53 seriously injured, make clear that no country is immune to mass deaths whether termed "terrorism," "hate crimes," or "violent extremism."
机译:欧洲国家可能会在正在进行的反恐斗争中考虑采取体制选择。全球范围内的情报改革研究表明,某些欧洲国家的决策者可能并未认真考虑某些反恐体制创新。关于法国情报机构和警察的有效性的国际新闻报道,在比利时,甚至更多,都极为负面。在3月22日伊斯兰国(IS / ISIS)袭击在国际机场和布鲁塞尔市中心炸死至少32人,炸伤300多人之后,《纽约时报》于2016年春季发布了一系列的文章证明了比利时情报机构的弱点。其4月12日的社论​​标题为“欧洲的紧急安全挑战”,2016年4月2日的《经济学家》(The Economist)中的一篇文章标题为“无波洛:比利时警察被IS所冒。更重要的是,大多数学术著作对发展更有效的反恐情报仍抱有极为悲观的态度。毫不奇怪,情报和反情报是欧盟及其成员国的首要关注主题。尽管已经发表了大量有关智力失败的文章,但是关于智力成功的文献却很少。在牢记基本考虑的同时,如以下声明中所述:“知道的人不说,那些说的人不知道”,但有足够的证据表明情报机构可能无法做到这一点。 DAESH / IS / ISIS推动的当前恐怖威胁提出的要求。 2015年12月2日在加利福尼亚州圣贝纳迪诺的袭击造成14人死亡,22人重伤; 2016年6月12日在佛罗里达州奥兰多发生的袭击中49人死亡,53人重伤,这表明没有一个国家不论是“恐怖主义”,“仇恨犯罪”还是“暴力极端主义”,都可以免于大规模死亡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号