首页> 外文期刊>International journal of information technology project management >Risk Profiles in Individual Software Development and Packaged Software Implementation Projects: A Delphi Study at a German-Based Financial Services Company
【24h】

Risk Profiles in Individual Software Development and Packaged Software Implementation Projects: A Delphi Study at a German-Based Financial Services Company

机译:单个软件开发和打包软件实施项目中的风险简介:位于德国的金融服务公司的Delphi研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this paper is to compare risk profiles of individual software development (ISD) and packaged software implementation (PSI) projects. While researchers have investigated risks in either PSI projects or ISD projects, an integrated perspective on how the risk profiles of these two types of information system (IS) projects differ is missing. To explore these differences, this work conducted a Delphi study at a German-based financial services company. The results suggest that: First, ISD projects seem to be more heterogeneous and face a larger variety of risks than the more straightforward PSI projects. Second, ISD projects seem to be particularly prone to risks related to sponsorship, requirements, and project organization. Third, PSI projects tend to be predominantly subject to risks related to technology, project planning, and project completion. Finally, in contrast to available lists of risks in IS projects and irrespective of the project type, the paper found a surprisingly high prominence of technology and testing-related risks.
机译:本文的目的是比较单个软件开发(ISD)和打包软件实施(PSI)项目的风险状况。虽然研究人员已经研究了PSI项目或ISD项目中的风险,但缺少关于这两种信息系统(IS)项目的风险概况如何不同的综合观点。为了探索这些差异,这项工作在一家德国金融服务公司进行了德尔菲研究。结果表明:首先,与更直接的PSI项目相比,ISD项目似乎更加异构,面临更大的风险。其次,ISD项目似乎特别容易遭受与赞助,需求和项目组织有关的风险。第三,PSI项目通常主要承受与技术,项目计划和项目完成相关的风险。最后,与IS项目中可用的风险列表(无论项目类型如何)相比,本文发现技术和测试相关风险的突出程度出乎意料。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号