首页> 外文期刊>International journal of industrial organization >Experts Vs. Discounters: Consumer Free-riding And Experts Withholding Advice In Markets For Credence Goods
【24h】

Experts Vs. Discounters: Consumer Free-riding And Experts Withholding Advice In Markets For Credence Goods

机译:专家VS。折扣商:消费者搭便车和专家在信用商品市场上不提供建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper studies the incentives for credence goods experts to invest effort in diagnosis if effort is both costly and unobservable, and if they face competition by discounters who are not able to perform a diagnosis. The unobservability of diagnosis effort and the credence characteristic of the good induce experts to choose incentive compatible tariff structures. This makes them vulnerable to competition by discounters. We explore the conditions under which honestly diagnosing experts survive competition by discounters; we identify situations in which experts misdiagnose consumers in order to prevent them from free-riding on experts' advice; and we discuss policy options to solve the free-riding consumers-cheating experts problem.
机译:如果努力成本高昂且不可观察,并且他们面临无法执行诊断的折扣店的竞争,则本文研究了信任商品专家在诊断上投入精力的动机。诊断工作的不可观察性和商品的信誉特征促使专家选择激励兼容的关税结构。这使它们容易受到折扣店的竞争。我们探索诚实诊断专家在折扣店竞争中生存的条件。我们找出专家误诊消费者的情况,以防止他们随意乘专家的建议;我们讨论了解决搭便车的消费者欺诈专家问题的政策方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号