首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health >Does seasonal allergic rhinitis increase sensitivity to ammonia exposure?
【24h】

Does seasonal allergic rhinitis increase sensitivity to ammonia exposure?

机译:季节性过敏性鼻炎会增加对氨暴露的敏感性吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Allergic inflammation in the upper airways represents a wide-spread health issue: Little is known about whether it increases sensitivity to airborne chemicals thereby challenging established exposure limits that neglect such differences in susceptibility. To investigate the role of pre-existing allergic inflammation, 19 subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and 18 control subjects with low risk of sensitization were exposed for 4h to ammonia in two concentrations (cross-over design): 2.5 ppm (odor threshold) and 0-40 ppm (occupational exposure limit: 20 ppm TWA). Prior to the whole-body exposure, it was confirmed that subjects with SAR showed persistent inflammation outside the pollen season as indicated by increased exhaled nitric oxide and total immunoglobulin E in serum compared to controls. Despite concentration-dependent increases in chemosensory perceptions and acute symptoms, SAR status did not modulate subjective effects of exposure. Moreover, SAR status did not affect the investigated physiological endpoints of sensory irritation: While eye-blink recordings confirmed weak ocular irritation properties of ammonia at 0-40 ppm, this effect was not enhanced in SAR subjects compared to controls. Irrespective of SAR status, exposure to 0-40 ppm ammonia did not result in a cortisol stress response, objective nasal obstruction as measured with anterior active rhinomanometry, or an inflammatory response as indexed by substance P, tumor-necrosis-factor alpha, and high-mobility-group protein 1 in nasal lavage fluid. At least for the malodorous compound ammonia, these results do not support the hypothesis that SAR enhances chemosensory effects in response to local irritants. Before generalizing this finding, more compounds as well as sensitization to perennial allergens need to be investigated. (C) 2017 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
机译:上呼吸道的过敏性炎症代表了一个广泛存在的健康问题:人们对它是否会增加对空气中化学物质的敏感性从而挑战既定的暴露极限而忽略了敏感性差异的知之甚少。为了研究已有的过敏性炎症的作用,将19名季节性过敏性鼻炎(SAR)受试者和18例低致敏风险的对照组受试者暴露于氨气中4小时(两种浓度)(交叉设计):2.5 ppm(气味阈值) )和0-40 ppm(职业暴露极限:20 ppm TWA)。在全身暴露之前,已证实SAR受试者在花粉季节以外表现出持续的炎症,这是由与对照相比血清中呼出的一氧化氮和总免疫球蛋白E升高所表明的。尽管化学感应和急性症状的浓度依赖性增加,但SAR状态并未调节暴露的主观影响。此外,SAR状态不会影响所研究的感觉刺激生理终点:尽管眨眼记录证实了0-40 ppm的氨对眼的刺激性较弱,但与对照组相比,SAR患者的这种作用并未增强。不论SAR状态如何,暴露于0-40 ppm的氨水均不会导致皮质醇应激反应,前路主动鼻压力计测量得出的客观鼻阻塞或由P物质,肿瘤坏死因子α和高指数所指示的炎症反应鼻灌洗液中的运动组蛋白1。至少对于恶臭的合成氨,这些结果不支持SAR增强对局部刺激物的化学感应作用的假设。在归纳此发现之前,需要研究更多的化合物以及对多年生变应原的敏感性。 (C)2017 Elsevier GmbH。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号