首页> 外文期刊>International journal of hydrogen energy >A comparative study of lean burn and exhaust gas recirculation in an HCNG-fueled heavy-duty engine
【24h】

A comparative study of lean burn and exhaust gas recirculation in an HCNG-fueled heavy-duty engine

机译:HCNG重型发动机稀薄燃烧和废气再循环的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Two dilution strategies, exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) with a stoichiometric mixture and excess air with a lean mixture, were investigated for an 11 L, 6-cylinder H-2-blended compressed natural gas (HCNG) engine. The engine was operated at 1260 rpm and 50% of maximum engine load (575 Nm) at maximum brake torque for each strategy. To evaluate the EGR approach, the stoichiometric combustion mode was varied, and to evaluate the lean combustion mode, the excess air ratio was varied. The maximum EGR rate and lean flammability limit were constrained by the combustion stability. The dilution rate was employed to compare the dilution effect on engine performance and emission levels under identical levels of the dilution for both combustion modes. The thermal efficiencies under stoichiometric combustion with EGR were lower than those under lean combustion, owing to a higher pumping loss and a lower combustion speed. The total hydrocarbon emissions under the lean combustion mode were lower than those under the stoichiometric combustion mode only when the combustion speed was relatively slow, due to the higher mixing rate caused by the active combustion. As the dilution rate was increased in the lean combustion mode, the rate of decrease in NO. emissions slowed compared to the stoichiometric combustion mode. The lowest level of engine-out NO. emissions was observed under lean combustion. (C) 2017 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:对于11升6缸H-2混合压缩天然气(HCNG)发动机,研究了两种稀释策略,即具有化学计量比混合物的废气再循环(EGR)和具有稀薄混合物的过量空气。对于每种策略,发动机均以最大制动扭矩在1260 rpm和最大发动机负载(575 Nm)的50%下运行。为了评估EGR方法,改变了化学计量燃烧模式,为了评估稀薄燃烧模式,改变了过量空气比。最大EGR率和稀薄燃烧极限受燃烧稳定性的限制。在两种燃烧模式下,在相同的稀释水平下,采用稀释率比较稀释对发动机性能和排放水平的影响。由于较高的泵送损失和较低的燃烧速度,在EGR的化学计量燃烧下的热效率低于稀薄燃烧的热效率。稀薄燃烧模式下的总碳氢化合物排放量仅在燃烧速度相对较慢时才比化学计量燃烧模式下的碳氢化合物排放量低,这是由于主动燃烧导致较高的混合速率。随着稀薄燃烧模式中稀释率的增加,NO的减少率也随之增加。与化学计量燃烧模式相比,排放降低了。最低的发动机输出NO。在稀薄燃烧下观察到排放。 (C)2017氢能出版物有限公司。由Elsevier Ltd.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《International journal of hydrogen energy》 |2017年第41期|26094-26101|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Korea Inst Machinery & Mat, Environm Syst Res Div, Engine Res Team, Daejeon 305343, South Korea;

    Korea Inst Machinery & Mat, Environm Syst Res Div, Engine Res Team, Daejeon 305343, South Korea;

    Korea Inst Machinery & Mat, Environm Syst Res Div, Engine Res Team, Daejeon 305343, South Korea;

    Korea Inst Machinery & Mat, Environm Syst Res Div, Engine Res Team, Daejeon 305343, South Korea;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    CNG; HCNG; Lean burn; Exhaust gas recirculation; Thermal efficiency; Emissions;

    机译:天然气;高浓天然气;稀薄燃烧;废气再循环;热效率;排放;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:19:27

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号