...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of hydrogen energy >Hydrogen production using methane: Techno- economics of decarbonizing fuels and chemicals
【24h】

Hydrogen production using methane: Techno- economics of decarbonizing fuels and chemicals

机译:使用甲烷制氢:燃料和化学物质脱碳的技术经济学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the near-to-medium future, hydrogen production will continue to rely on reforming of widely available and relatively low-cost fossil resources. A techno-economic framework is described that compares the current best practice steam methane reforming (SMR) with potential pathways for low-CO2 hydrogen production; (i) Electrolysis coupled to sustainable renewable electricity sources; (ii) Reforming of hydrocarbons coupled with carbon capture and sequestration (CGS) and; (iii) Thermal dissociation of hydrocarbons into hydrogen and carbon (pyrolysis). For methane pyrolysis, a process based on a catalytic molten Ni-Bi alloy is described and used for comparative cost estimates. In the absence of a price on carbon, SMR has the lowest cost of hydrogen production. For low-CO2 hydrogen production, methane pyrolysis is significantly more economical than electrochemical-based processes using commercial renewable power sources. At a carbon price exceeding $21 t(-1) CO2 equivalent, pyrolysis may represent the most cost-effective means of producing low-CO2 hydrogen and competes favorably to SMR with carbon capture and sequestration. The current cost disparity between renewable and fossil-based hydrogen production suggests that if hydrogen is to fulfil an expanding role in a low CO2 future, then large-scale production of hydrogen from methane pyrolysis is the most cost-effective means during the transition period while infrastructure and end-use applications are deployed. (C) 2017 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在不久的将来,制氢将继续依靠对广泛使用且成本相对较低的化石资源的改革。描述了一种技术经济框架,该框架将当前的最佳实践蒸汽甲烷重整(SMR)与低二氧化碳生产氢气的潜在途径进行了比较; (i)电解与可持续的可再生能源结合; (ii)碳氢化合物的重整以及碳捕获和封存(CGS);以及(iii)碳氢化合物热分解为氢和碳(热解)。对于甲烷热解,描述了一种基于催化熔融Ni-Bi合金的工艺并将其用于比较成本估算。在没有碳价的情况下,SMR的制氢成本最低。对于低二氧化碳的氢气生产,甲烷热解比使用商业可再生电源的基于电化学的过程经济得多。在碳价超过$ 21 t(-1)CO2当量的情况下,热解可能代表生产低CO2氢的最具成本效益的手段,并且在碳捕获和封存方面与SMR竞争激烈。当前可再生能源与化石能源氢生产之间的成本差异表明,如果氢能在低二氧化碳未来中发挥更大的作用,那么甲烷热解大规模生产氢是过渡期间最经济的方式,而基础架构和最终用途应用程序已部署。 (C)2017氢能出版物有限公司。由Elsevier Ltd.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《International journal of hydrogen energy》 |2018年第5期|2540-2555|共16页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Queensland, Sch Chem Engn, Dow Ctr Sustainable Engn Innovat, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia;

    Univ Queensland, Sch Chem Engn, Dow Ctr Sustainable Engn Innovat, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia;

    Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Chem & Biochem, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA;

    Univ Queensland, Sch Chem Engn, Dow Ctr Sustainable Engn Innovat, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia;

    Univ Queensland, Sch Chem Engn, Dow Ctr Sustainable Engn Innovat, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia;

    Univ Queensland, Sch Chem Engn, Dow Ctr Sustainable Engn Innovat, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia;

    Univ Queensland, Sch Chem Engn, Dow Ctr Sustainable Engn Innovat, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Hydrogen production; Methane pyrolysis; Decarbonization; Low-CO2; Techno-economic;

    机译:制氢;甲烷热解;脱碳;低二氧化碳;技术经济;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号