...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Conversion & Management >Comparative exergy and exergoeconomic analysis between liquid fuels production through chemical looping hydrogen generation and methane reforming with CO_2
【24h】

Comparative exergy and exergoeconomic analysis between liquid fuels production through chemical looping hydrogen generation and methane reforming with CO_2

机译:通过CO_2通过化学循环氢生成和甲烷重整产生液体燃料生产与甲烷重整的比较漏斗和exergo经济分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recently, the concept of carbon utilization has been widely investigated to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate dependence on fossil fuels. For this purpose, two different carbon capture and utilization processes to produce liquid fuels, carbon looping cyclic reforming (CCR) and carbon dioxide hydrogenation based on chemical looping hydrogen generation (CH-CLHG), are introduced. This article aims to identify which utilization method holds more potential for future technical development. To achieve it, comprehensive thermodynamic, economic and exergoeconomic assessments are implemented. The results indicate that the exergy efficiency of CH-CLHG system is 3.84% more than that of CCR system, and the cost of liquid fuels production is 36.64% less. It is also suggested that CCR system is superior to CH-CLHG system in terms of the liquid fuels output. When the electricity price is below 0.068 $/kWh, the cost of liquid fuels of CCR system is more competitive than that of CH-CLHG system. Since the higher fuel cost and larger exergy destruction, CCR system's exergy destruction cost is more significant. In addition, the exergy destruction and exergy efficiency as well as exergoeconomic performance of each main component are presented in detail to reveal the cost formation process, and to find out the measure that would improve system efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
机译:最近,已被广泛调查碳利用概念,以减少温室气体排放和减轻对化石燃料的依赖性。为此目的,引入了两种不同的碳捕获和利用方法,以产生液体燃料,碳环循环重整(CCR)和基于化学环状氢气产生(CH-CLHG)的二氧化碳氢化。本文旨在确定哪种利用方法对未来的技术开发具有更多潜力。为实现它,实施了全面的热力学,经济和exergo经济评估。结果表明,CH-CLHG系统的高度效率比CCR系统的低3.84%,液体燃料生产成本较少36.64%。还建议CCR系统在液体燃料输出方面优于CH-CLHG系统。当电价低于0.068美元/千瓦时,CCR系统的液体燃料成本比CH-CLHG系统更具竞争力。由于燃料成本较高和更大的漏洞破坏,CCR系统的漏洞破坏成本更为显着。此外,详细介绍了每个主要成分的漏洞破坏和漏洞效率以及每个主要组成部分的高度经济性能,以揭示成本形成过程,并找出将提高系统效率和成本效益的措施。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy Conversion & Management》 |2020年第10期|113239.1-113239.11|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Southwest Petr Univ Sch Chem & Chem Engn Key Lab Gas Proc Engn Chengdu 610500 Peoples R China|China Shenzhen Gas Corp Ltd Shenzhen 518040 Peoples R China;

    Southwest Petr Univ Sch Chem & Chem Engn Key Lab Gas Proc Engn Chengdu 610500 Peoples R China;

    China Shenzhen Gas Corp Ltd Shenzhen 518040 Peoples R China;

    Southwest Petr Univ Sch Chem & Chem Engn Key Lab Gas Proc Engn Chengdu 610500 Peoples R China|China Shenzhen Gas Corp Ltd Shenzhen 518040 Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Carbon utilization; Chemical looping hydrogen generation; Liquid fuels; Exergy analysis; Exergoeconomic analysis;

    机译:碳利用;化学循环氢生成;液体燃料;漏洞分析;exergo经济分析;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号