首页> 外文期刊>International journal of hydrogen energy >Techno-economic evaluation of hydrogen refueling stations with liquid or gaseous stored hydrogen
【24h】

Techno-economic evaluation of hydrogen refueling stations with liquid or gaseous stored hydrogen

机译:液态或气态储氢的加氢站的技术经济评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this study, different hydrogen refueling station (HRS) architectures are analyzed energetically as well as economically for 2015 and 2050. For the energetic evaluation, the model published in Bauer et al. [1] is used and norm-fitting fuelings according to SAE J2601 [2] are applied. This model is extended to include an economic evaluation. The compressor (gaseous hydrogen) resp. pump (liquid hydrogen) throughput and maximum pressures and volumes of the cascaded high-pressure storage system vessels are dimensioned in a way to minimize lifecycle costs, including depreciation, capital commitment and electricity costs. Various station capacity sizes are derived and energy consumption is calculated for different ambient temperatures and different station utilizations. Investment costs and costs per fueling mass are calculated based on different station utilizations and an ambient temperature of +12 degrees C. In case of gaseous trucked-in hydrogen, a comparison between 5 MPa and 20 MPa low-pressure storage is conducted. For all station configurations and sizes, a medium-voltage grid connection is applied if the power load exceeds a certain limit. For stations with on-site production, the electric power load of the hydrogen production device (electrolyzer or gas reformer) is taken into account in terms of power load. Costs and energy consumption attributed to the production device are not considered in this study due to comparability to other station concepts. Therefore, grid connection costs are allocated to the fueling station part excluding the production device. The operational strategy of the production device is also considered as energy consumption of the subsequent compressor or pump and the required low-pressure storage are affected by it. All station concepts, liquid truck-supplied hydrogen as well as stations with gaseous truck-supplied or on-site produced hydrogen show a considerable cost reduction potential. Long-term specific hydrogen costs of large stations (6 dispensers) are 0.63 (sic)kg - 0.76 (sic)kg (dependent on configuration) for stations with gaseous stored hydrogen and 0.18 (sic)/kg for stations with liquid stored hydrogen. The study focuses only on the refueling station and does not allow a statement about the overall cost-effectiveness of different pathways. (C) 2019 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在本研究中,对2015年和2050年的不同氢加气站(HRS)架构进行了有力和经济的分析。为进行有力的评估,该模型发表在Bauer等人的文章中。使用[1],并使用符合SAE J2601 [2]的规范拟合供油。该模型已扩展为包括经济评估。压缩机(气态氢)的响应。级联的高压存储系统容器的泵(液氢)通过量以及最大压力和体积的确定尺寸应最大程度地降低生命周期成本,包括折旧,资本投入和电力成本。得出不同的站点容量大小,并针对不同的环境温度和不同的站点利用率计算能耗。根据不同的电站利用率和+12摄氏度的环境温度,计算投资成本和每加油量的成本。对于气态载运的氢气,进行5 MPa和20 MPa低压存储的比较。对于所有站配置和大小,如果功率负载超过某个限制,则将应用中压电网连接。对于具有现场生产能力的站点,考虑到氢气生产设备(电解器或气体重整器)的电力负载。由于与其他站点概念具有可比性,因此本研究未考虑归因于生产设备的成本和能耗。因此,将电网连接成本分配给除生产装置之外的加油站部分。生产设备的运行策略也被认为是后续压缩机或泵的能耗,并且所需的低压存储也受到其影响。所有加油站概念,液态卡车提供的氢气以及带有气态卡车提供的或现场产生的氢气的站点都显示出可观的降低成本的潜力。大型工位(6个分配器)的长期特定氢气成本对于气态储氢站为0.63(sic)kg-0.76(sic)kg(取决于配置),而对于液态储氢站为0.18(sic)/ kg。该研究仅关注加油站,而没有陈述不同途径的总体成本效益。 (C)2019氢能出版物有限公司。由Elsevier Ltd.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号