首页> 外文期刊>International journal of health care quality assurance >Cost-effectiveness of Hepatitis A vaccination in a developed and developing country
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of Hepatitis A vaccination in a developed and developing country

机译:在发达国家和发展中国家进行甲肝疫苗接种的成本效益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose - Hepatitis A is a prevalent disease that is largely preventable by vaccine usage. The vaccine for this illness is highly underused in most regions. In an attempt to find the strategies that are most beneficial in regard to quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and cost in current environments, the purpose of this paper is to conduct cost-effectiveness analyses to investigate vaccination strategies in a more economically developed country (MEDC), generally known as a "developed" area: the USA, and a less economically developed country (LEDC), generally known as a "developing" area: the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Design/methodology/approach - This study used a dynamic transmission model for comparative effectiveness analyses. The model ran two different scenarios. The two regions studied have different policies and strategies for Hepatitis A vaccination currently, and also used different strategies in 2009. In the USA, a universal vaccination policy was modeled, along with a scenario in which it was removed. In Rio de Janeiro, a no vaccination policy was modeled, along with a scenario in which a universal vaccination policy was effected. Findings - The comparison of resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio values to accepted threshold values showed universal vaccination to be cost-effective in both the USA and Rio de Janeiro as compared to no vaccination. When episode and vaccination costs and vaccination efficacy were varied, this still remained true. Universal vaccination was found to result in lower incidence of Hepatitis A in both the USA and Rio de Janeiro. Over the twenty-year time horizon, universal vaccination is projected to prevent 506,945 cases of symptomatic Hepatitis A in the USA and 42,318 cases of Hepatitis A in Rio de Janeiro. Other benefits include a projected increase in cumulative QALYs through the use of universal vaccination. Originality/value - This analysis showed universal vaccination to be cost-effective as compared to no vaccination, and portions of the study's approach had not previously been applied in tandem to investigate Hepatitis A interventions. The results may help foster higher compliance rates for Hepatitis A vaccination and even greater per-person economic benefits of universal vaccination, particularly in the USA. The purpose of this study is also to encourage elevated levels of surveillance on age of infection in developing regions and consistent reevaluation utilizing dynamic transmission models in both the USA and Brazil, as well as other rapidly developing regions, in order to prevent future epidemics and costs associated with the disease.
机译:目的-甲型肝炎是一种普遍的疾病,可以通过疫苗的使用在很大程度上预防。在大多数地区,这种疾病的疫苗使用率都很高。为了找到在当前环境下对质量调整生命年(QALYs)和成本最有利的策略,本文的目的是进行成本效益分析,以研究更经济发达国家的疫苗接种策略(MEDC),通常称为“发达”地区:美国,以及经济欠发达的国家(LEDC),通常称为“发展中”地区:巴西里约热内卢州。设计/方法/方法-本研究使用动态传递模型进行比较有效性分析。该模型运行两种不同的方案。所研究的两个地区目前对甲型肝炎疫苗接种有不同的政策和策略,并且在2009年也使用了不同的策略。在美国,对通用疫苗接种政策进行了建模,并删除了这种情况。在里约热内卢,制定了不接种疫苗的政策,并制定了实施普遍接种政策的方案。调查结果-将成本效益比增量值与可接受的阈值进行比较,结果表明,与未接种疫苗相比,美国和里约热内卢普遍接种疫苗都具有成本效益。当发作和疫苗接种费用以及疫苗接种效力发生变化时,这仍然是正确的。在美国和里约热内卢,普遍接种疫苗可降低甲型肝炎的发病率。在二十年的时间范围内,预计普遍接种疫苗可预防美国506,945例有症状的甲型肝炎和里约热内卢的42,318例甲型肝炎。其他好处包括通过使用通用疫苗预计累积QALYs的增加。原创性/价值-该分析表明,与不进行常规疫苗接种相比,进行常规疫苗接种具有成本效益,并且该研究方法的某些部分以前未曾一前一后地用于研究甲型肝炎的干预措施。这些结果可能有助于提高甲型肝炎疫苗接种的依从率,甚至提高普遍接种疫苗的人均经济效益,尤其是在美国。这项研究的目的还在于鼓励在发展中地区提高对感染年龄的监测水平,并在美国和巴西以及其他快速发展的地区利用动态传播模型进行一致的重新评估,以防止未来的流行病和费用与疾病有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号