首页> 外文期刊>International journal of health care quality assurance >Uncovering the common ground in qualitative inquiry Combining quality improvement and phenomenology in clinical nursing research
【24h】

Uncovering the common ground in qualitative inquiry Combining quality improvement and phenomenology in clinical nursing research

机译:在定性探究中发现共同点在临床护理研究中结合质量改进和现象学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to describe the use of a common qualitative data set analysed with both a quality improvement tool to facilitate service improvement, and a rigorous research methodology to engage beginning nurse researchers in a mentored project. Design/methodology/approach - A qualitative cohort study of the experience of hospitalisation across six diagnostic groups interrogated data from 104 patient and carer interviews using the Picker Dimensions of Experience and Heideggerian Phenomenology. Findings - The paper reveals that well-conducted qualitative interviews can provide common ground for service improvement initiatives and rigorous research analysis. Research limitations/implications - The Picker Dimensions use simple coding methods that push findings towards utility, but at times are overly reductionist and exile any data not related to hospital services. Heideggerian phenomenology is training and resource intensive, but its exploration of the meaning of the illness experience provides a profound backdrop for the subsequent understanding of hospitalisation. Practical implications - The access that qualitative data provides to the patient and family's perspective is becoming increasingly valued in processes of ongoing quality improvement, clinical redesign and evaluation for hospital accreditation. Social implications - The intrinsic rewards of deep qualitative analysis for the staff involved are extraordinary. Clinicians were humbled by new understandings, which surprised them despite their long clinical experience. Originality/value - While quality improvement processes require training, ethics applications and data collection, the same framework can support rigorous qualitative research through use of the data as "common ground". The researchers experienced a tension, but eventually, a balance between the strengths and limitations of these combined modes of qualitative inquiry.
机译:目的-本文的目的是描述使用共同的定性数据集进行分析,这些数据集既使用质量改进工具来促进服务改进,又使用了严格的研究方法来使新进护士研究人员参与受指导的项目。设计/方法/方法-对六个诊断小组住院经验的定性队列研究,使用Picker Dimensions of Experience和Heideggerian现象学从104位患者和护理人员访谈中询问数据。调查结果-该文件表明,进行质量良好的访谈可以为服务改进计划和严格的研究分析提供共同基础。研究的局限性/意义-Picker Dimensions使用简单的编码方法将发现推向实用性,但有时过于简化并流放与医院服务无关的任何数据。海德格尔现象学是训练和资源密集型的,但是其对疾病经历意义的探索为随后对住院的理解提供了深刻的背景。实际意义-在持续的质量改进,临床重新设计和医院认证评估过程中,定性数据为患者和家庭的观点提供的访问越来越受到重视。社会影响-对参与人员进行深入的定性分析的内在奖励是非凡的。临床医生对新的认识感到谦卑,尽管他们有长期的临床经验,但使他们感到惊讶。原创性/价值-尽管质量改进过程需要培训,道德规范应用和数据收集,但是同一框架可以通过将数据用作“共同点”来支持严格的定性研究。研究人员经历了紧张的关系,但最终在定性探究的这些组合方式的优势与局限之间取得了平衡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号