首页> 外文期刊>International journal of green energy >Performance analysis of a novel hybrid power generation system integrated diesel generator with compressed heat energy storage
【24h】

Performance analysis of a novel hybrid power generation system integrated diesel generator with compressed heat energy storage

机译:一种新型混合动力发电系统集成柴油发电机的性能分析,具有压缩热能存储

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The time-dependent energy demand of energy islands may frequently change the operating condition of diesel generator (DG), leading to diesel engine operating under off-design conditions with low efficiency. In order to make the DG operate under efficient conditions and balance the mismatch of energy supply and demand in time, a novel hybrid power generation system integrated DG with compressed heat energy storage (CHEST) using sensible and latent thermal energy storage is proposed in this study. The overall efficiency of the proposed system could be further improved due to the waste heat recovery of exhaust and cooling water. Firstly, a parametric analysis of the CHEST unit is conducted to select optimal parameters and conditions for the CHEST unit. Then a comparative analysis between the traditional DG system and the proposed DG-CHEST coupling system with three operating strategies is carried out. Results indicate that Strategy A, B, and C could save fuel of 45.48 kg (17.74%), 44.22 kg (16.19%), and 38.89 kg (14.23%) a day, corresponding to the overall efficiency of 28.02%, 27.83%, and 26.22%, respectively, while it is only 20.89% for the conventional DG system. The comparative results among the three strategies show that the discharged power index (DPI) and discharged fraction (DF) decrease with the increase of control level of load factor.
机译:能源群岛的时间依赖的能量需求可能经常改变柴油发电机(DG)的运行条件,导致柴油发动机在低设计条件下运行,效率低。为了使DG在有效的条件下运行和平衡能量供应和需求的不匹配,在本研究中提出了一种新颖的混合发电系统,其中具有压缩和潜热能存储的压缩热能存储(胸部)进行了集成的DG 。由于废气和冷却水的废热回收,所提出的系统的整体效率可以进一步提高。首先,进行胸部单元的参数分析,为胸部单元选择最佳参数和条件。然后进行传统DG系统与具有三种操作策略的所提出的DG胸耦合系统之间的比较分析。结果表明,策略A,B和C可以节省45.48千克(17.74%),44.22公斤(16.19%)和38.89公斤(14.23%)的燃料,对应于28.02%的总效率,27.83%,分别为26.22%,常规DG系统仅为20.89%。三种策略中的比较结果表明,随着载荷因数的控制水平的增加,排出的电力指数(DPI)和排出的分数(DF)降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号