首页> 外文期刊>International journal of green economics >Green economy versus green economics: examining Africa's conceptual uncertainty in the post-Paris era
【24h】

Green economy versus green economics: examining Africa's conceptual uncertainty in the post-Paris era

机译:绿色经济与绿色经济学:考察巴黎后时代非洲的概念不确定性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Arguments exist within academic circles on the most appropriate economic organisation toolkit to drive post-Paris commitments. Two variants of green economy compete for attention: the green growth and green economics. Though ideas of greening the economy is catching on in Africa but the continent cannot leapfrog from its carbon intense trajectory to a low-carbon economy unless it is aligned with the tenets of a concept which is agreeable to the people. Using a desk study, we uncovered that with the current concept, there is no let up on emissions as green growth strategies are externally driven favouring depletion of natural capital. The green economics is the most suitable model for Africa owing to its interrelatedness with African biocommunitarianism world view. Solution to Africa's intractable agroecological problems lie in the flexible mechanism this variant avails. This convergence with Africa's ecological values allows a cultural shift capable of guaranteeing political buy-in to catalyse a green technological shift.
机译:学术界对最合适的经济组织工具包存在争论,以推动巴黎后的承诺。绿色经济的两种变体争夺注意力:绿色增长和绿色经济学。尽管非洲绿色经济的观念正在流行,但是非洲大陆不能从其碳密集的轨道跃升为低碳经济,除非它与人们可以接受的概念相一致。通过案头研究,我们发现在当前概念下,由于绿色增长战略是外部驱动的,有利于自然资本的消耗,因此排放量不会减少。由于绿色经济学与非洲生物群落主义世界观相互关联,因此绿色经济学是最适合非洲的模式。解决非洲棘手的农业生态问题的关键在于采用这种变体的灵活机制。与非洲生态价值的融合使文化转变能够保证政治上的支持,从而促进绿色技术转变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号