首页> 外文学位 >The political economy of energy based green economic development: Policy tools and their use for local energy based green economic development.
【24h】

The political economy of energy based green economic development: Policy tools and their use for local energy based green economic development.

机译:基于能源的绿色经济发展的政治经济学:政策工具及其在当地基于能源的绿色经济发展中的使用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Local economic development is in transition to "green economic development." Local governments in the U.S. and other countries have adopted a variety of policy tools to promote green economic development and are applying them to their local economies. The success of these efforts may depend on whether local officials have a systematic understanding of green development and how it is different from more conventional economic development approaches. One purpose of this study is to enhance our understanding of green development policy by advancing a theoretical framework and identifying empirical evidence to account for local green economic development activities and policies. The most basic but essential task is to understand when and how policy tools are used.;The factors influencing conventional economic development activities and green economic development activities are drawn from three explanatory approaches in the literature on urban policy and economic development: the economic pressure model, the political/institutional choice model, and development/environmental coalition model. These explanatory models are adapted and extended to account for energy based green economic development policy including the promotion of energy efficient technology, promotion of renewable energy development, and regulatory relief targeted to energy efficincy and renewables.;This investigation produces several potentially important findings. First, local decision makers' perceptions and motivations regarding the importance of green businesses and industries significantly influence the use of each of the four policy tools. Additionally, neighborhood and environmental protection organizations, which have not had much impact on conventional development, have a significant influence on green development policy. Also, a community's standard of living and collaborative activities for green development are linked to regulatory relief for energy efficient technology development by local governments.;Some of the same factors that determine conventional economic development activities such as administrative capacity, economic stress, development competition, voters' preference, and support of private organizations also influence the use of green economic development policy tools. An unanticipated finding is that Florida citizens registered as members of the Democratic or Green Party in Florida are less likely to support incentives and regulatory relief for renewable energy development. This curious result may reflect factors unique to Florida or cleavages in environmental voting blocks over renewable energy. Certain renewable energy sources are controversial and are purported to generate energy sprawl and negative environmental externalities. In Florida, renewable energy policy may be associated with Republicans because incentives and regulatory relief have usually been favored tools of the Christ administration. Since 2006, the Republican Party in power has emphasized climate changes and promoted renewable energy development.;This study concludes that the development incentives for local green economic development are the product of political bargaining and collective action among stakeholders, rather than a product of economic pressures or conditions. This is in stark contrast with regulatory relief for green economic development. While regulatory relief for the use of energy efficient technology is significantly influenced by economic pressure and conditions, regulatory relief for renewable energy development is substantially influenced by political choice and stakeholders' activities.;Comparison of development incentives and regulatory relief also provides new insights. Incentives for energy efficient technology are influenced by political/institutional factors and stakeholders' power and roles. In contrast regulatory relief to promote energy efficient technology development is shaped more by community economic pressures and conditions. However, both incentives and regulatory relief for renewable energy development are influenced by political bargaining and the power of environmental advocacy coalitions. The conclusion urges local governments or decision makers to pay attention to the distinctions highlighted in this analysis in the design, adoption and implementation of policy tools for green economic development.
机译:地方经济发展正在向“绿色经济发展”过渡。美国和其他国家/地区的地方政府已采用各种政策工具来促进绿色经济发展,并将其应用于当地经济。这些努力的成功可能取决于地方官员是否对绿色发展有系统的了解,以及与传统的经济发展方式有何不同。这项研究的目的之一是通过发展理论框架并确定经验证据来解释当地的绿色经济发展活动和政策,从而加深我们对绿色发展政策的理解。最基本但必不可少的任务是了解何时以及如何使用政策工具。影响常规经济发展活动和绿色经济发展活动的因素是从有关城市政策和经济发展的文献中的三种解释方法得出的:经济压力模型,政治/机构选择模型和发展/环境联盟模型。对这些解释性模型进行了调整和扩展,以考虑到基于能源的绿色经济发展政策,包括促进能源效率技术,促进可再生能源发展以及针对能源效率和可再生能源的监管救济。该调查产生了一些潜在的重要发现。首先,当地决策者对绿色企业和产业重要性的看法和动机极大地影响了四个政策工具的使用。此外,对常规发展影响不大的社区和环境保护组织对绿色发展政策也有重大影响。此外,社区的绿色发展生活和合作活动与地方政府对节能技术开发的监管救济有联系。一些决定常规经济发展活动的因素,例如行政能力,经济压力,发展竞争,选民的偏好以及私营组织的支持也影响了绿色经济发展政策工具的使用。一项出乎意料的发现是,在佛罗里达州登记为民主党或绿党成员的佛罗里达州公民不太可能支持针对可再生能源开发的激励措施和监管救济措施。这个奇怪的结果可能反映出佛罗里达州独有的因素或对可再生能源的环境投票中的分裂。某些可再生能源是有争议的,据称会造成能源泛滥和负面的环境外部性。在佛罗里达州,可再生能源政策可能与共和党人有关,因为激励措施和监管救济通常是基督管理当局所偏爱的工具。自2006年以来,共和党执政以来一直强调气候变化并促进了可再生能源的发展。;本研究得出的结论是,促进当地绿色经济发展的激励措施是利益攸关方之间政治谈判和集体行动的产物,而不是经济压力的产物或条件。这与对绿色经济发展的监管救济形成鲜明对比。虽然使用节能技术的监管救济受到经济压力和条件的显着影响,但可再生能源发展的监管救济在很大程度上受到政治选择和利益相关者活动的影响。发展激励措施与监管救济的比较也提供了新的见解。节能技术的激励措施受到政治/机构因素以及利益相关者的权力和作用的影响。相反,促进经济高效技术发展的监管救济更多地取决于社区的经济压力和状况。但是,对可再生能源发展的激励措施和监管救济都受到政治谈判和环境倡导联盟力量的影响。该结论敦促地方政府或决策者在设计,采用和实施绿色经济发展的政策工具时,要注意本分析中强调的区别。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ha, Hyunsang.;

  • 作者单位

    The Florida State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Florida State University.;
  • 学科 Area Planning and Development.;Political Science Public Administration.;Sociology Public and Social Welfare.;Energy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 152 p.
  • 总页数 152
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:44:48

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号