...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of geomechanics >Fundamental Issues of Elastic Viscoplastic Modeling of the Time-Dependent Stress-Strain Behavior of Geomaterials
【24h】

Fundamental Issues of Elastic Viscoplastic Modeling of the Time-Dependent Stress-Strain Behavior of Geomaterials

机译:岩土材料随时间变化的应力-应变行为的弹性粘塑性建模的基本问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper, a number of fundamental concepts are presented and explained. These include (1) differences among an instant compression line, a normal consolidation line, and a true instant compression line; (2) the uniqueness of viscoplastic strain rates with a stress-strain state; (3) whether the creep compression is smaller than the instant compression; (4) the separation of the total strain rates; (5) the relation between elastic-plastic models and elastic viscoplastic (EVP) models, etc. The major conclusions are the following: (1) the elastic compression is the true instant compression; (2) the magnitude of a creep-strain rate at a stress-strain state point is unique, independent of the loading path to reach this point; (3) the true instant (elastic) compression is much smaller than the creep compression; (4) it is more appropriate that strain rates of geomaterials are composed of elastic strain rates and viscoplastic strain rates; (5) the one-dimensional (1D) EVP (1D EVP) is a genuine extension of Maxwell's linear rheological model for considering the nonlinear behavior of soils; (6) the EVP model is more general than an elastic-plastic model; (7) the nonlinear functions proposed by the author are good for fitting the creep compression and the compression under high stress of most soft soils in 1D straining; and (8) the three-dimensional EVP model is rigorously derived using the 1D EVP model approach and the modified Cam-Clay model, but further improvements of this model are still needed. At the end, a number of areas are presented for further study. (C) 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
机译:在本文中,提出并解释了许多基本概念。其中包括:(1)即时压缩线,正常合并线和真实即时压缩线之间的差异; (2)具有应力-应变状态的粘塑性应变率的唯一性; (3)蠕变压缩是否小于瞬时压缩; (4)分离总应变率; (5)弹塑性模型与弹性粘塑性(EVP)模型之间的关系。主要结论如下:(1)弹性压缩是真实的即时压缩; (2)在应力应变状态点的蠕变应变率的大小是唯一的,与到达该点的载荷路径无关。 (3)真正的瞬时(弹性)压缩比蠕变压缩小得多; (4)土工材料的应变率由弹性应变率和粘塑性应变率组成更合适; (5)一维(1D)EVP(1D EVP)是考虑土壤非线性行为的麦克斯韦线性流变模型的真正扩展; (6)EVP模型比弹塑性模型更笼统; (7)作者提出的非线性函数非常适合一维应变中大多数软土的蠕变压缩和高应力下的压缩。 (8)使用一维EVP模型方法和改进的Cam-Clay模型严格推导了三维EVP模型,但仍需要对该模型进行进一步的改进。最后,提出了许多领域以供进一步研究。 (C)2015年美国土木工程师学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号