首页> 外文期刊>International journal of general systems >Combining nonspecificity measures in Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence
【24h】

Combining nonspecificity measures in Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence

机译:结合Dempster-Shafer证据理论中的非特异性测度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Dempster-Shafer theory (DST) of evidence coexist two types of uncertainty: conflict and nonspecificity. The maximum of entropy is a total uncertainty measure that verifies an important set of properties in this theory. We prove that this function has a fault of sensibility to changes in evidence in situations where only the part of nonspecificity is presented in the uncertainty (uncertainty without conflict), producing no-logical values. We analyse two measures of nonspecificity presented in DST, which have been used as part of total uncertainty measures. We compare their behaviour, focusing on situations where only the part of nonspecificity is presented in the uncertainty. We will see that it makes sense to combine them and use this combination as part of a total uncertainty measure verifying an important set of properties and behaviours. This new total measure has not the mentioned problem of lack of sensitivity to changes in evidence.
机译:在证据的Dempster-Shafer理论(DST)中,不确定性共存两种类型:冲突和非特异性。熵的最大值是一种总的不确定性度量,可以验证该理论中的一组重要属性。我们证明,在不确定性(不确定性无冲突)中仅表现出部分非特异性的情况下,该功能对证据变化不敏感,从而产生了无逻辑的价值。我们分析了DST中提出的两种非特异性度量,这些度量已用作总不确定性度量的一部分。我们比较它们的行为,重点是在不确定性中仅表现出部分非特异性的情况。我们将看到将它们组合在一起并作为总不确定性度量的一部分来使用是有意义的,该度量用于验证一组重要的特性和行为。这项新的总体衡量标准没有提到对证据变化缺乏敏感性的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号