首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Forensic Mental Health >Predicting Institutional Aggression by Defensive Prison Inmates: An Examination of the Personality Assessment Inventory Treatment Consideration Scales
【24h】

Predicting Institutional Aggression by Defensive Prison Inmates: An Examination of the Personality Assessment Inventory Treatment Consideration Scales

机译:由防御性监狱囚犯预测机构侵略:人格评估库存处理考虑量表的检验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Although the Antisocial Features scale of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI; Morey, 2007) is a robust predictor of institutional aggression, recent research (Edens & Ruiz, 200513. Edens, J. F. and Ruiz, M. A. 2005. Personality Assessment Inventory Interpretive Report for Correctional Settings (PAI-CS) professional manual, Lutz, FL: PAR, Inc. View all references, 200612. Edens, J. F. and Ruiz, M. A. 2006. On the validity of validity scales: The importance of defensive responding in the prediction of institutional misconduct. Psychological Assessment, 18: 220-224. [CrossRef], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®]View all references) suggests its efficacy is limited among offenders who engage in positive impression management. In this follow-up study, we explored other PAI variables that might predict aggression among 134 prison inmates who Edens and Ruiz (2005, 2006) identified as producing defensive PAI profiles. Somewhat counterintuitively, the Nonsupport scale was negatively associated with aggressive-defiant and physically aggressive infractions in this subgroup of inmates. Results are discussed in the context of the “threatened egotism” literature and implications for institutional risk assessment are reviewed.View full textDownload full textKeywordsPersonality Assessment Inventory, aggression, defensiveness, profile validity, social support, prisoners, threatened egotismRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14999010903358771
机译:尽管人格评估量表的反社会特征量表(PAI; Morey,2007年)是机构侵略的有力预测指标,但最近的研究(Edens和Ruiz,200513年。Edens,JF和Ruiz,MA 2005年。人格评估量表解释性报告)设置(PAI-CS)专业手册,佛罗里达州卢茨市:PAR,Inc.查看所有参考文献,200612。Edens,JF和Ruiz,MA2006。关于有效性量表的有效性:防御反应在预测机构不当行为中的重要性心理评估,18:220-224。[CrossRef],[PubMed],[Web of Science®]查看所有参考文献)表明,其有效性在从事积极印象管理的罪犯中有限。在这项后续研究中,我们探索了其他PAI变量,这些变量可能预测134名被Edens和Ruiz(2005,2006)识别为防御性PAI档案的囚犯的侵略行为。在某种程度上与直觉相反,在此囚犯子集中,Nonsupport量表与攻击性违抗和身体攻击性违规相关。在“受到威胁的自我主义”文献中讨论了结果,并审查了对机构风险评估的含义。查看全文下载全文关键词人格评估库存,攻击性,防御性,形象有效性,社会支持,囚犯,受威胁的自我主义相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14999010903358771

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号