首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Intelligent Systems >A consensus reaching process for large-scale group decision making with heterogeneous preference information
【24h】

A consensus reaching process for large-scale group decision making with heterogeneous preference information

机译:具有异构偏好信息的大规模群决策的共识达成过程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many group decision making (GDM) models enable experts to use only one preference information representation form. It is natural to allow experts to express preferences in various formats considering the heterogeneity of experts. In this case, how to reach the consensus of a group from heterogeneous preference information is an attractive research issue. This study proposes a consensus reaching process for large-scale GDM with heterogeneous preference information. First, we review various preference formats including preference orderings, numerical assessments, interval-valued assessments, and linguistic assessments. To facilitate the heterogeneous information aggregation, we classify experts into subgroups according to their preference types rather than the similarities of preference values, and then aggregate the homogeneous preference values in each subgroup. The subgroup priorities derived by homogeneous methods are then aggregated into global priorities. An ordinal consensus measuring process based on individual orderings is introduced. To reach the ordinal consensus, optimization models are constructed to ensure each subgroup's preferences equivalent to the global preferences, and the recommended ranges and strength of preference modification are given to experts. Finally, the proposed method is validated by an illustrative example about blockchain platform selection.
机译:许多组决策(GDM)模型使专家能够仅使用一个偏好信息表示形式。允许专家以考虑专家的异质性以各种格式表达偏好是自然的。在这种情况下,如何从异质偏好信息中达成一组的共识是一个有吸引力的研究问题。本研究提出了具有异构偏好信息的大规模GDM的共识达成过程。首先,我们审查了各种偏好格式,包括偏好排序,数值评估,间隔评估和语言评估。为了促进异构信息聚集,我们根据其偏好类型而不是偏好值的相似性对专家进行分类到子组,然后聚合每个子组中的同质偏好值。然后,通过均匀方法导出的子组优先级将汇总到全球优先级。介绍了基于个体排序的序数共识测量过程。为了达到序数共识,构建优化模型,以确保每个子组相当于全局偏好的偏好,以及推荐的范围和优先修改的强度给予专家。最后,通过关于区块链平台选择的说明性示例验证了所提出的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号