首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems >Balance Dynamic Clustering Analysis and Consensus Reaching Process With Consensus Evolution Networks in Large-Scale Group Decision Making
【24h】

Balance Dynamic Clustering Analysis and Consensus Reaching Process With Consensus Evolution Networks in Large-Scale Group Decision Making

机译:在大型群体决策中与共识演化网络平衡动态聚类分析及达成过程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Large-scale group decision-making (LSGDM) solution is usually based on the clustering analysis process (CAP) and consensus reaching process (CRP). However, CAP and CRP can be contradictory since CAP is performed based on the differences between potentially small groups and CRP is conducted to improve the overall similarity of a large group. To balance CAP and CRP, a dynamic clustering analysis process (DCAP) based on consensus evolution networks is proposed. A clustering algorithm proposed based on community detection method can be used to handle the diverse network structures with dynamic consensus thresholds. The clustering validity based on the intracluster consensus levels in subgroups and the intercluster consensus level among subgroups is evaluated. Then, the DCAP after each feedback adjustment round in CRP is reanalyzed. In such a way, effective clustering can also be found after a satisfying consensus is reached. Finally, a case study shows the availability of this approach and comparative analyses are provided to highlight the advantages from both theoretical and numerical perspectives.
机译:大规模群决策(LSGDM)解决方案通常基于聚类分析过程(CAP)和达成过程(CRP)。然而,由于基于潜在的小组和CRP之间的差异来进行帽进行帽,因此帽和CRP可以是矛盾的,以提高大型群体的总体相似性。为了平衡帽和CRP,提出了基于共识演化网络的动态聚类分析过程(DCAP)。基于社区检测方法提出的聚类算法可用于处理具有动态共识阈值的不同网络结构。评估基于亚组中的内部间共识水平的聚类有效性以及子组之间的混合物共识水平。然后,在CRP中每次反馈调整后的DCAP进行重新分析。以这种方式,在达到满足共识之后也可以发现有效的聚类。最后,案例研究表明,提供了这种方法的可用性和比较分析,以突出来自理论和数值观点的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号