...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Emerging Markets >Investor behavior in ETF markets: a comparative study between the US and emerging markets
【24h】

Investor behavior in ETF markets: a comparative study between the US and emerging markets

机译:ETF市场的投资者行为:美国与新兴市场的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present the results of a study on investor behavior in exchange-traded fund (ETF) markets. The standard feedback trading model of Sentana and Wadhwani (1992) is used in a sample of 18 ETFs contracts in Brazil, China, South Africa, Korea, Mexico and India, as well as three ETFs contracts in the US market.Design/methodology/approachThe sample includes data on daily closing prices and net asset values (NAVs) for three ETFs from each of the emerging markets of Brazil, China, Mexico, Korea and India, as well as on three ETFs from the US market. The authors used the earliest start date available in the Thomson Reuters database pertaining to all of the ETFs, and all series ended on May 5, 2017, and applied the well-established Santana and Wadhwani (1992) seminal model to evaluate evidence of feedback trading in the sample.FindingsThe empirical analysis suggests that there is evidence of feedback trading in emerging markets such as Brazil, Korea, Mexico and India, while there is no such evidence for the US market. The results are consistent with the view that developed markets investors are prone to pursue fundamental-driven investment strategies, while emerging markets investors appear to have informational guided behavior.Research limitations/implicationsEmerging markets still make up a very small part of the global ETF market, led by the USA. Nevertheless, it is extremely important that studies of this nature be gradually expanded as these markets grow, in order to verify how emerging markets compare to their developed counterparts in terms of the efficiency of information sharing and rationalization of its operations.Practical implicationsEmerging markets policy makers could benefit from these findings by stimulating new mechanisms that could minimize informational asymmetry and the persistence of so-called noise traders, a phenomenon observed recently in studies regarding ETF markets (Brown, Davies and Ringgenberg, 2018).Originality/valueThe behavior of investors was investigated by analyzing a sample of 18 ETFs from the emerging markets of Brazil, China, South Africa, Korea, India and Mexico, as well as three ETFs from the US market. Despite of being investigated separately both emerging (Charteris et al., 2014) and developed markets (Chau et al., 2011), the innovation consists in comparing those markets in a single study, pursuing to explain potential reasons for the differences observed between developed and emerging markets.
机译:目的本文的目的是介绍对交易所交易基金(ETF)市场上的投资者行为的研究结果。 Sentana和Wadhwani(1992)的标准反馈交易模型用于巴西,中国,南非,韩国,墨西哥和印度的18个ETF合约样本,以及美国市场上的三个ETF合约样本。该方法的样本包括来自巴西,中国,墨西哥,韩国和印度的每个新兴市场的三个ETF以及来自美国市场的三个ETF的每日收盘价和资产净值(NAV)的数据。作者使用汤森路透数据库中与所有ETF有关的最早开始日期,所有系列均于2017年5月5日结束,并使用完善的Santana和Wadhwani(1992)开创性模型来评估反馈交易的证据实证分析表明,在新兴市场(如巴西,韩国,墨西哥和印度)有反馈交易的证据,而在美国市场则没有这种证据。结果与以下观点一致:发达市场投资者倾向于奉行基本驱动的投资策略,而新兴市场投资者似乎具有信息指导的行为。研究局限性/含义新兴市场在全球ETF市场中仍然只占很小的一部分,由美国领导。然而,极为重要的是随着这些市场的增长逐步扩大这种性质的研究,以验证新兴市场在信息共享效率和运营合理化方面与发达市场相比如何。实践意义新兴市场政策制定者通过刺激可以最大程度地减少信息不对称和所谓的噪声交易者持续性的新机制,可以从这些发现中受益,这是最近在ETF市场研究中观察到的一种现象(Brown,Davies和Ringgenberg,2018年)。通过分析来自巴西,中国,南非,韩国,印度和墨西哥等新兴市场的18种ETF以及来自美国市场的3种ETF进行抽样调查。尽管新兴市场(Charteris等,2014)和发达市场(Chau等,2011)分别进行了调查,但创新之处在于在一项研究中比较了这些市场,目的是解释发达市场之间差异的潜在原因。和新兴市场。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号