...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of emergency management >Emergency decision making: an exploration of tensions between communities of practice
【24h】

Emergency decision making: an exploration of tensions between communities of practice

机译:紧急决策:探索实践社区之间的紧张关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Through the lens of 'communities of practice' (Wenger, 2000) we examined decision-making boundaries and tensions in multiagency settings. Sixteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with operational decision makers from services across Australia. Data analysis was contextual and narrative, focusing on meanings signifying cultures and practices. Results indicate that protocols and guidelines which provide boundaries for a community of practice, could at times become an obstacle. Participants reported difficulties in sharing a 'common level of understanding' and 'getting the bigger picture'. The strongest theme was the importance placed on building relationships between services prior to emergency events. We found capability of multiagency decision making is enhanced when informal multiagency networks are already in place. These networks contribute to building a shared understanding. We propose that multiagency communities of practice could be enhanced if services increased their level of formal multiagency engagement and promoted the informal multiagency networking of their members and teams.
机译:通过“实践社区”的视角(Wenger,2000),我们研究了多机构环境下的决策边界和紧张关系。来自澳大利亚各地服务业的运营决策者进行了16次半结构化访谈。数据分析是上下文和叙事的,着重于代表文化和实践的含义。结果表明,为实践界提供界限的协议和指南有时可能会成为障碍。与会者报告说,在共享“共同的理解水平”和“获得更大的前景”方面存在困难。最强烈的主题是在紧急事件发生之前建立服务之间关系的重要性。我们发现,非正式的多机构网络已经到位后,多机构决策制定的能力就会增强。这些网络有助于建立共识。我们建议,如果服务部门增加其正式的多机构参与水平并促进其成员和团队的非正式多机构联网,则可以增强多机构实践社区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号