首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Cultural Policy >Journalism, public imagination and cultural policy
【24h】

Journalism, public imagination and cultural policy

机译:新闻学,公众想象力和文化政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although the phrase 'cultural policy' would rarely form on journalists' lips, the cultural results of journalism permeate national imaginations in the totality of their impressions, through processes of persuasion set-up within an apparent framework of choice. Problematic cultural effects are produced through the mechanisms of gigantic markets whose very randomness seduces observers into believing that they are protected from conspiracy and manipulation. The paper explores certain mystifications within the ethos of mass market journalism, whose professional techniques beguile both producers and public in the way they suppress criticism or sympathy, and eradicate all but populist positions. The paper contends that many journalists are fuelled by an ethos of puritanical anti-intellectualism. These themes are pursued by deconstructing some of the 'professional' codes in journalism and its didactic literature, in order to expose a mechanism for channelling public mentality that is condoned through the anti-intellectualism of its techniques. The paper analyses media texts and processes of journalistic enculturation, engaging broadly with discourses inspired by the Frankfurt School and ideas of hegemony refined by Gramsci.
机译:尽管“文化政策”一词很少会出现在记者的嘴上,但新闻的文化结果却是通过在一个明显的选择框架内进行的说服力建立的过程,渗透到了整个国家的想象中。有问题的文化影响是通过巨大市场机制产生的,其巨大的随机性诱使观察者相信他们受到了阴谋和操纵的保护。本文探讨了大众市场新闻精神内的某些谜团,其专业技术以压制批评或同情并消灭除民粹主义立场之外的方式,欺骗了生产者和公众。该论文认为,许多新闻工作者受到清教徒反思想主义精神的鼓舞。通过解构新闻学及其教学文献中的某些“专业”规范来追求这些主题,以便揭示一种通过其技术的反知识主义而宽容的引导公众心态的机制。本文分析了媒体文本和新闻工作者的培养过程,并广泛涉及了法兰克福学派和格拉姆西提出的霸权思想。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号