首页> 外文期刊>International journal of conflict management >Task conflict, relationship conflict and agreement-seeking behavior in Chinese top management teams
【24h】

Task conflict, relationship conflict and agreement-seeking behavior in Chinese top management teams

机译:中国高层管理团队的任务冲突,关系冲突和寻求协议的行为

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - This paper aims to investigate the effects task conflict has on agreement seeking behavior and interpersonal conflict. In addition, it seeks to examine the moderating role of trust on the effects of agreement seeking behavior and interpersonal conflict on the styles of handing conflict, namely, avoidance, collaboration, and third party intervention.rnDesign/methodology/approach - Using a structured survey instrument, this paper gathered data from 252 senior executives from Mainland China and analyzed these using the regression technique to see how interpersonal trust between executives moderates the relationship between conflict and conflict response mechanisms. The study also investigates the relationship between task and relationship conflict as well as agreement-seeking behavior among Chinese executives in Mainland China. Findings - Results show that the presence of interpersonal trust among executives affects the conflict responses for the benefit of organization. The results show that task conflict in top management teams is positively related to relationship conflict and negatively related to agreement-seeking behavior. The data support the view that intra-group trust moderates the relationship between agreement-seeking behavior and collaborating responses such that high-trust groups will have greater collaboration than low-trusting teams. Results also support that intra-group trust moderates the relationship between agreement-seeking behavior and third party responses such that high-trust groups will have greater third-party responses than low-trusting teams. Research limitations/implications - Self-report measures may have some inherent social desirability bias. Despite this potential weakness, this study examines Chinese executives and therefore provides insights into top management team literature.rnPractical implications - This study contributes to both practicing managers as well as to strategic management literature. This study suggests that administrators need to focus on interpersonal trust while dealing with the outcomes of task and relationship conflict.rnOriginality/value - Although the study is related to Chinese executives, the findings from the study, that task conflict has its affect on interpersonal conflict and agreement-seeking behavior, contribute to the strategic decision making literature.
机译:目的-本文旨在研究任务冲突对寻求协议行为和人际冲突的影响。此外,它还试图研究信任对寻求协议行为和人际冲突对处理冲突方式(即避免,协作和第三方干预)的影响的调节作用。设计/方法/方法-使用结构化调查本文以工具为工具,收集了来自中国大陆252位高管的数据,并使用回归技术对其进行了分析,以了解高管之间的人际信任如何缓解冲突与冲突应对机制之间的关系。该研究还调查了中国大陆高管之间的任务与关系冲突之间的关系以及寻求协议的行为。调查结果-结果表明,高管人员之间的人际信任会影响对冲突的响应,从而使组织受益。结果表明,高层管理团队中的任务冲突与关系冲突成正相关,与寻求协议行为成负相关。数据支持这样的观点,即组内信任可缓和协议寻求行为与协作响应之间的关系,从而使高信任度组比低信任度组具有更大的协作性。结果还支持组内信任可缓和协议寻求行为与第三方响应之间的关系,从而使高信任度组比低信任度组具有更多的第三方响应。研究的局限性/暗示-自我报告的措施可能具有一些固有的社会期望偏差。尽管存在这种潜在的弱点,本研究还是对中国高管人员进行了研究,从而提供了对高层管理团队文献的见识。实践意义-这项研究对实践中的经理以及战略管理文献都做出了贡献。这项研究表明,管理者在处理任务和关系冲突的结果时需要关注人际信任。rn原创性/价值-尽管该研究与中国高管有关,但研究结果表明任务冲突对人际冲突有影响和寻求协议的行为,有助于战略决策文献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号