首页> 外文期刊>International journal of cognitive linguistics >The Language-Specificity of Conceptual Structure: Taking Stock
【24h】

The Language-Specificity of Conceptual Structure: Taking Stock

机译:概念结构的语言专用性:评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

It is argued that the absence of strong absolute universals in semantic categorization and the simultaneous existence of striking crosslinguistic similarities in semantic categories is precisely what one should expect on a view of language as a 'bio-cultural hybrid' (Evans and Levinson 2009). The discussion then moves on to address the theory of the mind and the language-cognition interface developed in Jackendoff (1997, 2002). Following up on Bohnemeyer (2010), it is argued that algebraic, symbolic representations in a Jackendoffian 'Conceptual Structure' may be much more language-specific than iconic, image-schematic representations in the 'Spatial Structure' system envisioned in this theory. This in turn suggests that, rather than language having evolved as a system of external representations of Conceptual Structure, as Jackendoff suggests, Conceptual Structure may have co-evolved with language as an interface between language and Spatial Structure, with culture being the driving force behind both processes.
机译:有人认为,在语义分类中缺乏强大的绝对普遍性,而在语义类别中同时存在惊人的跨语言相似性正是人们将语言视为“生物-文化混合体”的期望(Evans and Levinson 2009)。然后,讨论着重讨论心理理论和Jackendoff(1997,2002)开发的语言-认知界面。在Bohnemeyer(2010)的后续研究中,有人认为,在Jackendoffian的“概念结构”中,代数符号表示可能比该理论所设想的“空间结构”系统中的符号形象表示形式更特定于语言。这反过来表明,与Jackendoff所建议的那样,语言不是作为概念结构的外部表示系统演化而来的,概念结构可能与语言共同发展,成为语言和空间结构之间的接口,而文化是其背后的推动力。这两个过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号