...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis >A Comparison of Self-Hypnosis Versus Progressive Muscle Relaxation in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis and Chronic Pain
【24h】

A Comparison of Self-Hypnosis Versus Progressive Muscle Relaxation in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis and Chronic Pain

机译:多发性硬化症和慢性疼痛患者的自我催眠与进行性肌肉放松的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Twenty-two patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and chronic pain we recruited into a quasi-experimental trial comparing the effects of self-hypnosis training (HYP) with progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) on pain intensity and pain interference; 8 received HYP and the remaining 14 participants were randomly assigned to receive either HYP or PMR. HYP-condition participants reported significantly greater pre- to postsession as well as pre- to posttreatment decreases in pain and pain interference than PMR-condition participants, and gains were maintained at 3-month follow-up. Most of the participants in both conditions reported that they continued to use the skills they learned in treatment and experienced pain relief when they did so. General hypnotizability was not significantly related to treatment outcome, but treatment-outcome expectancy assessed before and after the first session was. The results support the efficacy of self-hypnosis training for the management of chronic pain in persons with MS.
机译:我们招募了22名患有多发性硬化症(MS)和慢性疼痛的患者,进行了一项半实验性试验,比较了自我催眠训练(HYP)和进行性肌肉放松(PMR)对疼痛强度和疼痛干扰的影响; 8名接受了HYP,其余14名参与者被随机分配为接受HYP或PMR。与PMR病情参与者相比,HYP病情参与者报告的治疗前和治疗后以及疼痛治疗前和治疗后疼痛减轻明显大于PMR病情参与者,并且在随访3个月后仍保持获益。在这两种情况下的大多数参与者都报告说,他们继续使用他们在治疗中学到的技能,并且在这样做时感到疼痛得到缓解。总体催眠作用与治疗效果没有显着相关,但是在第一次治疗前后评估的治疗结果预期值却与此相关。结果支持自我催眠训练对MS患者慢性疼痛的管理效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号