首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Civil Engineering,Transaction A:Civil Engineering >Assessment of ASCE 7-16 Seismic Isolation Bearing Torsional Displacement
【24h】

Assessment of ASCE 7-16 Seismic Isolation Bearing Torsional Displacement

机译:ASCE 7-16隔震支座扭转位移的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Base isolation provisions in ASCE 7 Standard have been historically shown to be conservative in estimating seismic demands. New torsional bearing base isolation displacement expressions have been proposed recently by the latest ASCE 7-16 Standard. This study compares the accuracy of the new ASCE 7-16 static-based isolation expressions for additional bearing displacement due to plane torsion to the response obtained using simplified structural dynamics' plane torsion theory expressions. In addition, it conducts a parametric study to assess the effect of accidental eccentricity, damping ratio, and plan aspect ratio on the accuracy of ASCE 7-16 bearing displacement expression. The results showed that the ASCE 7-16 undamped displacement estimations improved compared to the significant conservatism of ASCE 7-10 by 7-33% depending on the eccentricity condition and ratio, which may further promote the use of base isolation in the US as a seismic hazard mitigation solution. However, the study also revealed that a considerable conservatism of the new base isolation bearing displacement provisions of ASCE 7-16 still exists in some cases, which ranged from 52 to 105% in the case of three equal fundamental frequencies and 5-20% in the case of equal lateral frequency and distinct torsional frequency. The study also showed that the ASCE 7-16 conservatism is proportional to the eccentricity and is more pronounced with biaxial eccentricity compared to single eccentricity. Furthermore, the results show that ASCE 7-16 expression accuracy significantly declines with damped systems with a possibility of un-conservative estimation of bearing displacements that can reach 25-40% with larger eccentricities. In addition, the ASCE 7-16 torsional displacement was shown to be inversely proportional to the plan aspect ratio with a discrepancy that can reach +/- 20%. The study also exhibited that the ASCE 7-16 torsional displacement conservatism is slightly affected by increasing damping ratio above 4%.
机译:历史上已经证明了ASCE 7标准中的基础隔离规定在估计地震需求方面是保守的。最新的ASCE 7-16标准最近提出了新的扭转轴承基础隔离位移表达式。这项研究比较了基于平面扭转的新ASCE 7-16静态隔离表达式对于由于平面扭转引起的附加轴承位移的精度,该响应使用简化的结构动力学的平面扭转理论表达式获得了响应。此外,它还进行了参数研究,以评估意外偏心率,阻尼比和平面纵横比对ASCE 7-16轴承位移表达精度的影响。结果表明,根据偏心条件和比率,与ASCE 7-10的显着保守性相比,ASCE 7-16的无阻尼位移估计提高了7-33%,这可能会进一步促进在美国作为基础隔离地使用减轻地震灾害的解决方案。但是,研究还表明,在某些情况下,ASCE 7-16中新的基础隔震支座位移规定仍存在相当大的保守性,在三个相等的基频情况下,范围从52%到105%,而在3%的基本频率下则为5-20%。横向频率相等且扭转频率不同的情况。研究还表明,ASCE 7-16保守性与偏心率成正比,与单轴偏心率相比,双轴偏心率更为明显。此外,结果表明,在阻尼系统中,ASCE 7-16的表达精度会显着下降,有可能不保守地估计偏心率较大时可达25-40%的轴承位移。此外,ASCE 7-16扭转位移与平面纵横比成反比,差异可达到+/- 20%。研究还表明,ASCE 7-16扭转位移保守性受阻尼比增加到4%以上的影响很小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号