...
首页> 外文期刊>The international information & library review >Implications of Institutional Repositories on Contributors' Professional and Publishing Practices: A Survey
【24h】

Implications of Institutional Repositories on Contributors' Professional and Publishing Practices: A Survey

机译:机构知识库对撰稿人的专业和出版实践的影响:一项调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

An institutional repository is a system for dissemination and stewardship of the intellectual life and scholarship of an institution. It has become a new way for the institutions to contribute to the broader world of scholarship (Giesecke, 2011). In spite of the global recognition of institutional repositories as an open access scholarly communication channel, institutional repositories are still struggling with the problem of non-participation from contributors in developing countries like India. This study conveys the results of a survey conducted at a minority university of India. The study is an expression of the opinion of 542 faculty members and research scholars pertaining to the possible implications of institutional repositories on their professional and publishing practices. The study is undertaken to: Determine the level of awareness of institutional repository among contributors; identify the reasons for participation and non-participation of contributors; examine the implications of institutional repository on contributors professional and publishing practices; analyze the major obstacles/hindrances in the growth of an institutional repository; and suggest measures for better implementation and development of an institutional repository in future. With the help of the statistical techniques such as chi-square test and weighted mean the study resulted that the majority of the contributors are well aware about the concept of institutional repository, the majority of contributors have not deposited in an institutional repository so far, long term preservation of research materials is the first ranked reason for participation in an institutional repository, copyright and plagiarism concern is the main reason behind contributors' non-participation in institutional repository, increased accessibility of research output is the major implication of the institutional repository on contributors professional practices, saved cost of publishing in a journal is the biggest implication of institutional repository on contributors publishing practices, and contributors demand more control on ownership, access and security in future for an institutional repository. This article is aimed at the institutions that report low-use and low-deposit repositories. It may be used to convince the contributors about the value of institutional repositories, importance of participating in an institutional repository and possible implications on their professional and publishing practices. The study is also intended at the management of the institutions to take notice of the contributors' demands for future participation and develop policies accordingly for removing major barriers in the growth of institutional repositories and improving contributions and quality of content in the institutional repositories.
机译:机构知识库是一个用于传播和管理机构的知识生活和学术研究的系统。它已成为各机构为更广泛的学术领域做出贡献的新途径(Giesecke,2011)。尽管全球都认可机构知识库为开放访问的学术交流渠道,但机构知识库仍在努力解决发展中国家(如印度)的捐助者不参与的问题。这项研究传达了在印度少数民族大学进行的一项调查的结果。这项研究表达了542名教职员工和研究学者对机构知识库对其专业和出版实践的潜在影响的观点。进行这项研究的目的是:确定捐助者对机构知识库的认识水平;查明贡献者参与和不参与的原因;审查机构资源库对贡献者的专业和出版实践的影响;分析机构储存库发展的主要障碍/障碍;并提出措施,以便将来更好地实施和开发机构知识库。在卡方检验和加权均值等统计技术的帮助下,研究结果表明,大多数贡献者都对机构存储库的概念了如指掌,到目前为止,大多数贡献者尚未存放在机构存储库中长期保存研究材料是参与机构知识库的首要原因,对版权和窃的关注是贡献者不参与机构知识库的主要原因,研究成果的可访问性是机构知识库对参与者的主要影响专业实践,节省在期刊中的出版成本,是机构存储库对投稿人出版实践的最大影响,投稿人要求对机构存储库的所有权,访问权和安全性进行更多控制。本文针对报告低使用量和低存储库的机构。它可以被用来说服贡献者有关机构知识库的价值,参与机构知识库的重要性以及对其专业和出版实践的可能影响。该研究还旨在使机构的管理人员注意到贡献者对未来参与的需求,并相应地制定政策,以消除机构存储库增长中的主要障碍并改善机构存储库中内容的贡献和质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号