首页> 外文期刊>International environmental agreements: politics, law and economics >Market-based mechanism and'climate justice': reframing the debate for a way forward
【24h】

Market-based mechanism and'climate justice': reframing the debate for a way forward

机译:基于市场的机制和“谦净司法”:向前辩护的辩论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Paris Agreement on climate change recognizes, reluctantly albeit, the importance of climate justice' in its Preamble. Despite a change from a top-down burden-sharing approach to a bottom-up pledge and review regime, concerns of distributive justice remain central to the evolution of climate research, regime, and policy. The Paris Agreement also proposes a new market-based mechanism to promote ambition. Reasserting the unavoidability of climate justice' concerns, and responding to the suggestion that the proposed new market-based mechanism could learn from the experience of the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), this paper argues that such a recommendation should be tested against a comprehensive understanding of compatibility between justice and the market. This paper postulates that both justice and the market have institutional underpinnings, which embed them into deeper, and interconnected, layers of values and relations. Arguing that climate justice' is best understood as an agreed ensemble of values,' we propose that the architecture of the UNFCCC in which these values are articulated, negotiated, and agreed upon needs to be conceptualized as consisting of four distinct, but evolving, institutional spheres: ambition, obligations and entitlements, mechanisms, and deliberation. The approach is illustrated using the case of the CDM, and implications are suggested for the proposed market-based mechanism under the Paris Agreement. The paper argues that the concerns of climate justice' have multiple institutional dimensions, and the market-based mechanisms may contribute to realizing certain dimensions of climate justice,' while considerably subverting others. The extent of both outcomes depends greatly on the agreed' conception of justice, design of mechanisms, and capabilities of the participants. Our findings suggest a judicious combination of non-market mechanisms with the market-based mechanisms would better serve the desired goal.
机译:关于气候变化的巴黎协议承认,不情愿地,气候正义的重要性“在其序言中”。尽管自上而下的负担分担方法对自下而期的承诺和审查制度的变化,但分配司法的担忧仍然是气候研究,制度和政策的演变的核心。巴黎协议还提出了一种新的基于市场的机制来促进雄心壮志。重申气候司法的不可避免的关注点,并回答提出的新市场机制可以从清洁发展机制(CDM)的经验中学习的建议,本文认为,应对全面的理解进行测试司法与市场之间的兼容性。本文假定司法和市场都有机构支撑,将它们融入更深层次,相互联系的层数和关系。争论气候正义“最好被理解为价值的商定集合”,我们建议将这些价值观的联合国气候变化框架公约的架构,谈判,谈判和商定,需要概念化,由四个不同但不断发展的制度组成领域:野心,义务和权利,机制和审议。使用CDM的案例说明了这种方法,并在巴黎协议下提出了基于市场的基于市场机制的影响。本文认为,气候正义“有多种机构维度的担忧,并基于市场的机制可能有助于实现气候正义的某些方面,”同时大大颠覆了他人。两种结果的程度都取决于商定的“司法的概念,机制的概念,参与者的能力和能力。我们的研究结果表明,非市场机制的明智组合与基于市场的机制更好地服务于所需的目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号