...
首页> 外文期刊>International environmental agreements: politics, law and economics >Who is driving Russian climate policy? Applying and adjusting veto players theory to a non-democracy
【24h】

Who is driving Russian climate policy? Applying and adjusting veto players theory to a non-democracy

机译:谁在推动俄罗斯的气候政策?在非民主国家中运用和调整否决权人理论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

What is driving Russian climate policy? This article focuses on the veto player approach developed by George Tsebelis and its applicability for examining the power relations in climate change policy-making in Russia. It makes two original contributions: veto players analysis on Russian climate policy and proposals how to adjust to theory to be applied to non-democracies for comparison with democracies. After identifying the veto players and their preferences, and determining their equivalence in the decision-making process, two case studies are examined: the ratification of the Kyoto Protocol and the establishment of one of the Kyoto flexible mechanisms, Joint Implementation, in Russia. Regarding the power play between actors, the latter emerges as far more accessible than the former, where scholars can generally observe only the domestic debate-which, due to the absorption of democratic decision-making institutions by the president, is detached from the actual decision-making process. Three proposals are made for adjusting the veto players approach to facilitate qualitative analysis of Russian decision-making: (1) select cases which involve also lower-level actors in charge of policy implementation; (2) due to implementation problems, changes in the status quo must be sought deeper than in statute-level changes; and (3) note that motivations of actors beyond the actual policy substance can facilitate explanations of puzzling outcomes in the process .
机译:是什么在推动俄罗斯的气候政策?本文着重介绍乔治·塞贝里斯(George Tsebelis)开发的否决权参与人方法,及其在研究俄罗斯气候变化政策制定中的权力关系方面的适用性。它做出了两个最初的贡献:否决权人对俄罗斯的气候政策进行了分析,并提出了如何适应理论以应用于非民主国家以与民主国家进行比较的建议。在确定否决权参与者及其偏好并确定其在决策过程中的等效性之后,研究了两个案例研究:批准《京都议定书》和在俄罗斯建立《京都议定书》灵活机制之一《联合实施》。关于行为者之间的权力博弈,后者的出现比前者更容易获得,在那里,学者们通常只能观察到国内辩论,由于总统吸收了民主决策机构,因此国内辩论与实际决定无关。制作过程。为调整否决权参与人的方法提出了三点建议,以促进对俄罗斯决策的定性分析:(1)选择一些案例,这些案例还涉及负责政策实施的下级行为者; (2)由于实施方面的问题,必须寻求比法规变更更深入的现状变更; (3)注意,行为者的动机超出了实际的政策实质,可以有助于解释过程中令人费解的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号