首页> 外文期刊>International environmental agreements: politics, law and economics >Governing by expertise: the contested politics of (accounting for) land-based mitigation in a new climate agreement
【24h】

Governing by expertise: the contested politics of (accounting for) land-based mitigation in a new climate agreement

机译:以专业知识进行管理:新气候协议中有关(基于)陆地缓解的争议政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article analyzes the contested politics of including (and accounting for) land-based mitigation in a post-2020 climate agreement. Emissions from land have been only partially included to date within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and its Kyoto Protocol. The Paris Agreement, adopted in December 2015 and "applicable to all" for the post-2020 period, raises the possibility of unprecedented reliance on land-based mitigation. This has significant consequences for furthering both ambition and equity in global climate mitigation efforts. Yet, what are these consequences, and how have they manifested themselves in the existing (pre-2020) multilateral climate regime? What role do accounting rules for land-based mitigation play herein? In addressing these questions, we identify key dimensions of what we term the "governance by expertise" approach taken to land-based mitigation to date, which has served to reduce the environmental integrity of existing (developed country) mitigation efforts. Specifically, we analyze land-use accounting rules as a site of politics and highlight the "technicalization of politics" underway in this realm, which obscures the political implications of how land has been included to date. We conclude by considering whether the Paris Agreement institutionalizes similar dynamics, and the environmental integrity and equity implications of doing so.
机译:本文分析了在2020年后的气候协议中纳入(并考虑到)陆上减排的争议政治。迄今为止,土地排放仅部分纳入了《联合国气候变化框架公约》及其《京都议定书》。 2015年12月通过的《巴黎协定》在2020年后阶段“适用于所有人”,增加了空前依赖陆上减灾的可能性。这对于在全球缓解气候变化的努力中促进雄心和公平具有重大影响。但是,这些后果是什么?它们如何在现有的(2020年前)多边气候体制中体现出来?陆上减灾的会计规则在这里起什么作用?在解决这些问题时,我们确定了迄今为止我们对陆基减缓采取的“专长治理”方法的关键方面,该方法已降低了现有(发达国家)减缓措施的环境完整性。具体来说,我们将土地使用会计规则分析为一个政治场所,并强调此领域中正在进行的“政治技术化”,这掩盖了迄今为止土地被包括在内的政治含义。最后,我们考虑《巴黎协定》是否制度化了类似的动力,以及这样做的环境完整性和公平意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号