首页> 外文期刊>Intellectual property forum >Geoblocking in Australia: Intellectual Property Rights versus Consumer Freedom - Where Does the Balance Lie?
【24h】

Geoblocking in Australia: Intellectual Property Rights versus Consumer Freedom - Where Does the Balance Lie?

机译:澳大利亚的地理封锁:知识产权与消费者自由-平衡点在哪里?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Geoblocking is a practice used to prevent or restrict access by internet users to online content, goods and services on the basis of a user's geographic location.2 The practice of geoblocking is widespread across the world. It raises a number of complex issues involving intellectual property law, competition law and Australia's obligations under international agreements. The Productivity Commission's inquiry in 2015-2016 into Australia's Intellectual Property Arrangements recommended the Australian Government clarify that it is not an infringement of copyright to circumvent geoblocking technology. This is not the first time such a recommendation has been made to the Australian Government. However, to date, nothing has been done to clarify the law regarding geoblocking in Australia. The current use of geoblocking technology and its circumvention in Australia is a topic lacking coverage and public understanding, with little commentary and no consideration judicially on the issue. This article discusses the workings of geoblocking measures and their circumvention and considers the recommendations for reform. I will then analyse the issues that could arise from implementing the recommendations, particularly in relation to intellectual property, and discuss other factors that should be further considered by the Australian Government. Consideration of the approaches taken in other regions, such as the United States ("US") and Europe, will also be discussed.
机译:地理封锁是一种用于根据用户的地理位置阻止或限制互联网用户访问在线内容,商品和服务的做法。2地理封锁的做法在世界范围内广泛存在。它提出了许多复杂的问题,涉及知识产权法,竞争法和澳大利亚根据国际协议承担的义务。生产力委员会在2015-2016年对澳大利亚的《知识产权安排》进行了调查,建议澳大利亚政府明确指出,规避地理封锁技术并不侵犯版权。这不是第一次向澳大利亚政府提出这样的建议。但是,迄今为止,尚未做出任何澄清澳大利亚地质封堵法的法律。澳大利亚目前对地理封锁技术的使用及其规避是一个缺乏报道和公众理解的话题,很少发表评论,也没有在司法上考虑这个问题。本文讨论了地理封锁措施的工作及其规避,并考虑了改革建议。然后,我将分析实施建议时可能产生的问题,尤其是与知识产权有关的问题,并讨论澳大利亚政府应进一步考虑的其他因素。也将讨论在其他地区(例如美国(“ US”)和欧洲)采取的方法的考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号