首页> 外文期刊>Intellectual property forum >The Conflict between Farmers Rights in the Food and Agriculture Organization ('FAO') Treaty and Corporate Plant Breeder Laws
【24h】

The Conflict between Farmers Rights in the Food and Agriculture Organization ('FAO') Treaty and Corporate Plant Breeder Laws

机译:粮食及农业组织(“粮农组织”)条约中的农民权利与公司植物育种者法律之间的冲突

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The story of quinine showed the genesis of ignoring farmers' rights, by fraudulently super-adding European taxonomical naming systems, with the apparent force of law. A formal change of the name of the Brazilian rubber plant, from an ancient Indigenous naming system to the Linnaean system, apparently occurred in Europe in 1775, by means of a legislative-style debate among botanists. Indigenous farmers were unlikely to have been part of this debate. This is arguably an instance of fraud by craftiness.
机译:奎宁的故事是通过以明显的法律效力欺骗性地增加了欧洲生物分类命名系统,从而表明了无视农民权利的起源。通过植物学家之间的立法式辩论,显然在1775年欧洲发生了巴西橡胶厂名称的正式变更,从古老的土著命名系统到Linnaean系统。土著农民不太可能参与这场辩论。可以说,这是出于欺诈的欺诈行为。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Intellectual property forum》 |2018年第114期|39-55|共17页
  • 作者单位

    Carrington Rand, Hong Kong, SAR, People's Republic of China;

    School of Law, Sultan Sharif Ali Islamic University (UNISSA), Brunei Darussalam;

    Botanical Archives, Carrington Rand, Canberra, Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号