...
首页> 外文期刊>Intellectual Property Decisions >Madonna Ciccone v (1) Associated Newspapers Ltd (2) Bonnie Robinson
【24h】

Madonna Ciccone v (1) Associated Newspapers Ltd (2) Bonnie Robinson

机译:麦当娜·西科尼(1)联合报业有限公司(2)邦妮·罗宾逊(Bonnie Robinson)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The claimant, Madonna, took the view that ANL's response to her 'Statement of Contentions', which was the equivalent of the usual Particulars of Claim (see the immediately preceding report, number 32047), did not provide a full pleading to certain items. Madonna therefore sought an order that the particular matters be pleaded to.rnThe judge criticised the way the matter had arisen, saying that it was more a request for further and better particulars, in which case there should be a document setting out the allegations as to which particulars or elaboration were required. ANL should then have been invited to respond appropriately and for issue to be joined if the response was insufficient.
机译:索赔人麦当娜(Madonna)认为ANL对她的“争执声明”的答复与通常的索赔详细信息相同(请参见前一份报告,编号32047),但未对某些项目提供完整的辩护。麦当娜因此寻求命令,要求将特定事项提出抗辩。法官对该事项的产生方式进行了批评,称这更多是要求提供更多更好的详细信息,在这种情况下,应有一份文件阐明有关该事项的指控。需要哪些细节或细节。然后应邀请ANL做出适当回应,如果回应不足,则应加入该问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号