...
首页> 外文期刊>Intellectual property & technology law journal >Willfulness Trends of the Federal Circuit and Recommendations to Avoid Willful Infringement
【24h】

Willfulness Trends of the Federal Circuit and Recommendations to Avoid Willful Infringement

机译:联邦巡回法院的故意趋势以及避免故意侵权的建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The tort of willful infringement is punitive in nature and may result in enhanced damages. Willfulness has been found when the alleged infringer acts in "disregard of a patent" and lacks "a reasonable basis for believing it had a right to do what it did. Once an alleged infringer is given actual notice of infringement, the alleged infringer has "an affirmative duty of due care" to ensure that its product does not infringe. This duty of due care usually includes obtaining a competent legal opinion that the product does not infringe the patent claims, that the patent claims are invalid, or that the patent is unenforceable. By reasonably relying on such an opinion, the alleged infringer likely will maintain a good faith belief that its product does not infringe the claims of the asserted patent. To establish willful infringement, the patentee must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the alleged infringer acted without a reasonable basis. Willfulness is a question of fact that requires a finding of "culpable intent" and "deliberate or negligent wrongdoing." Willfulness will not be found if the alleged infringer, considering all of the circumstances, conducted itself in the same manner as a reasonable and prudent person. A court must consider the totality of the circumstances at the time notice was given to the alleged infringer. Therefore, any later-discovered defense that was unknown to the alleged infringer at the time notice was given is irrelevant to the willfulness inquiry.
机译:故意侵权的侵权行为本质上是惩罚性的,并可能导致损害增加。当涉嫌侵权者以“无视专利的方式”行事并且缺乏“合理理由认为其有权做其所做的事情时,便被发现具有故意性。一旦给了涉嫌侵权者实际的侵权通知,涉嫌侵权者就会“保证其产品不会受到侵权的“适当注意的肯定义务”。这种适当注意的义务通常包括获得有力的法律意见,即该产品未侵犯专利权利要求,专利权利要求无效或专利是通过合理地依靠这种意见,被指控的侵权人可能会保持真诚的信念,即其产品未侵犯所主张专利的权利要求。要确定故意侵权,专利权人必须通过明确而令人信服的证据证明侵权人没有合理的依据行事,故意是一个事实问题,需要找到“有罪的意图”和“故意或过失的不当行为”。如果被指控的侵权人在所有情况下都以与合理和审慎的人相同的方式行事,则没有发现。在通知被指控的侵权人时,法院必须考虑所有情况。因此,在通知发出之时,被指控的侵权人不知道的任何后来发现的辩护都与故意调查无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号