...
首页> 外文期刊>Intellectual property & technology law journal >Federal Circuit Ruling Portends Changes to Generic Drug Patent Infringement Litigation and Walker Process Antitrust Claims
【24h】

Federal Circuit Ruling Portends Changes to Generic Drug Patent Infringement Litigation and Walker Process Antitrust Claims

机译:联邦巡回法院的裁决预示着仿制药专利侵权诉讼和Walker流程反托拉斯索赔的变更

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In response to the Supreme Court's Medimmune decision, different panels of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit have issued decisions sustaining the justiciability of declaratory judgment actions by generics manufacturers attacking patents listed in the Orange Book against which plaintiffs have filed Paragraph IV certifications under the Hatch-Waxman Act. These cases make clear that the circuit no longer follows the former reasonable-apprehension-of-suit standard criticized by the Supreme Court in Medimmune. But the decisions leave unclear what precisely the new standard may be. In this article, James B. Kobak, Jr., and Robert P. Reznick of Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP investigate the implications of this recent case law for Walker Process and other antitrust claims that arernoften asserted in connection with claims that listed patents are invalid or not infringed.
机译:为了回应最高法院的Medimmune裁决,联邦巡回上诉法院的不同小组发布了裁决,维持仿制药制造商对《橙皮书》所列专利的仿制制造商的攻击性的可诉性,而原告已针对该橙皮书提交了IV段认证。哈奇-瓦克斯曼法案。这些案件清楚表明,巡回法院不再遵循最高法院在Medimmune中批评的合理诉讼标准。但是决定尚不清楚新标准到底是什么。在本文中,休斯·哈伯德与里德律师事务所(Hughes Hubbard&Reed LLP)的小詹姆斯·科巴克(James B. Kobak,Jr.)和罗伯特·P·雷兹尼克(Robert P. Reznick)调查了这一最新判例法对沃克程序和其他反托拉斯索赔的影响,这些反托拉斯索赔是与诺富顿断言有关上市专利无效的主张或未侵权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号