首页> 外文期刊>Intellectual property & technology law journal >Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes That Can Resolve FRAND Disputes Better Than District Court Litigation
【24h】

Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes That Can Resolve FRAND Disputes Better Than District Court Litigation

机译:比地方法院的诉讼更能解决FRAND争议的替代性争议解决程序

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While the opinions in the Microsoft and Innovatio cases display careful analysis by Judges Robart and Holderman, the complexity of such analyses introduces room for miscalculation by even the most skilled and intelligent jurists. Conceivably there are myriad variables and factors in any analysis of a fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory royalty, and a multitude of methodologies by which an analysis could be approached. Whether using a "top down" approach, "bottom up" approach, or placing a primary focus on avoiding royalty stacking, a FRAND analysis-similar to a valuation of real property-is not an exact science and may never lend itself to a completely satisfactory conclusion.
机译:尽管Microsoft和Innovatio案中的意见显示了Robart和Holderman法官的仔细分析,但此类分析的复杂性甚至为最熟练和最聪明的法学家带来了错误计算的空间。可以想象,在对公平,合理,非歧视性版税进行的任何分析中,都有无数的变量和因素,并且可以采用多种方法进行分析。无论是采用“自上而下”的方法,“自下而上”的方法,还是主要侧重于避免使用费累加,FRAND分析(类似于不动产的估值)都不是一门精确的科学,也可能永远无法完全运用结论令人满意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号