首页> 外文期刊>Intellectual property & technology law journal >Alternative Dispute Resolution for Patent Cases: The Eastern District of Texas, The Northern District of California, and The International Trade Commission
【24h】

Alternative Dispute Resolution for Patent Cases: The Eastern District of Texas, The Northern District of California, and The International Trade Commission

机译:专利案件的替代性争议解决:德克萨斯州东区,加利福尼亚北区和国际贸易委员会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is widely accepted as an efficient and often less-expensive method of resolving litigation. In the intellectual property (IP) area, ADR can be used to flexibly and quickly resolve complex disputes. By selecting ADR over litigation, parties enjoy numerous benefits unique to ADR, including: 1. confidentiality; 2. flexibility; 3. mutuality (the parties may maintain or formulate a lasting and mutually beneficial relationship); 4. effectiveness (the parties can save money and time by avoiding lengthy litigation); and 5. multiple jurisdictional resolution (the parties may simultaneously resolve many parallel disputes in other jurisdictions). Moreover, for patent holders, ADR prevents a judgment of patent invalidity. In addition, defendants can avoid potential treble damages and hefty attorney's fees associated with litigation.
机译:替代性纠纷解决(ADR)被公认为是解决诉讼的一种高效且通常较为廉价的方法。在知识产权(IP)领域,ADR可用于灵活快速地解决复杂的纠纷。通过在诉讼中选择ADR,当事人可以享受ADR独有的众多好处,包括:1.保密性; 2.灵活性; 3.相互之间(各方可以维持或制定持久的互利关系); 4.效力(当事人可以避免冗长的诉讼来节省金钱和时间); 5.多个司法管辖区解决方案(当事方可以同时解决其他司法管辖区中的许多并行争议)。而且,对于专利持有人,ADR可以防止专利无效的判断。此外,被告可以避免潜在的三倍损害赔偿以及与诉讼相关的高额律师费。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号