首页> 外文期刊>Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science >Shifting Loyalties: Reconsidering Psychology’s Subject Matter
【24h】

Shifting Loyalties: Reconsidering Psychology’s Subject Matter

机译:忠诚度的转变:重新考虑心理学的主题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Schwarz (IPBS: Integrative Psychology & Behavioral Science 43:3, 2009) cogently demonstrates that in conjunction with scientific conventionalism psychology has developed a rather deficient view of their subject matter: the human being. Psychology based on an impoverished notion of empirical has rendered subjectivity or ‘the measuring apparatus man’ invisible. As his story implicitly demonstrates, psychologists supported by a positivistic view of science (in part to be empirical) and notion of ‘objectivity’ have learned to trust their ‘rigorous’ methods instead of their participants as capable of revealing important and interesting phenomena. If we are going to take subjectivity and experience seriously there should be a cultivation of a new attitude or orientation regarding psychology’s subject matter (i.e., the human being) and science. This commentary discusses Mark Freeman’s (2007) argument that the first requirement of science should be ‘fidelity to the phenomena’ and elaborates on the implications for psychology grounded in this view of science.
机译:Schwarz(IPBS:整合心理学与行为科学43:3,2009)令人信服地证明,心理学与科学传统主义相结合已经对他们的主题:人类提出了相当不足的看法。基于经验主义的贫困概念的心理学已经使主观性或“测量仪器的人”变得不可见。正如他的故事所隐含地表明的那样,心理学家得到了科学的实证主义观点(部分是经验主义)和“客观性”概念的支持,他们学会了相信自己的“严谨”方法,而不是参与者能够揭示重要而有趣的现象。如果我们要认真对待主观性和经验,就应该对心理学的主题(即人类)和科学培养一种新的态度或取向。该评论讨论了马克·弗里曼(Mark Freeman,2007)的论点,即科学的首要要求应该是“对现象的忠诚”,并详细阐述了基于这种科学观的心理学含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号