首页> 外文期刊>Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science >Literature as a Meaningful Life Laboratory
【24h】

Literature as a Meaningful Life Laboratory

机译:文学作为有意义的生活实验室

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Meaningful life is emotionally marked off. That’s the general point that Johansen (IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science 44, 2010) makes which is of great importance. Fictional abstractions use to make the point even more salient. As an example I’ve examined Borges’ famous fiction story. Along with the examples of Johansen it provides an informative case of exploring symbolic mechanisms which bind meaning with emotions. This particular mode of analysis draws forth poetry and literature in general to be treated as a “meaningful life laboratory”. Ways of explanation of emotional effect the art exercises on people, which had been disclosed within this laboratory, however, constitute a significant distinction in terms that I have designated as “referential” and “substantive”. The former appeals to something that has already been charged with emotional power, whereas the latter comes to effect by means of special symbolic mechanisms creating the emotional experience within the situation. Johansen, who tends to explain emotions exerted by the art without leaving the semiotic perspective, is drawn towards the “referential” type of explanation. Based upon discussions in theory of metaphor and Robert Witkin’s sociological theory of arts it is demonstrated an insufficient of “referential” explanation. To overcome a monopoly of “referential” explanation of emotional engagement, in particular, in literature, means to break away from the way of reasoning, stating endless references to “something else”, presupposing the existence of something already significant and therefore sharing its effects.
机译:有意义的生活在情感上被标记。这就是Johansen(IPBS:《综合心理与行为科学》 2010年第44期)提出的普遍观点,这一点非常重要。虚构的抽象使观点更加突出。例如,我研究了博尔赫斯的著名小说故事。连同Johansen的示例,它提供了一个探索性的案例,探讨了将意义与情感联系在一起的符号机制。这种特殊的分析方式通常将诗歌和文学作品视为“有意义的生活实验室”。在本实验室中已经披露了艺术锻炼对人的情感影响的解释方法,但是在我指定为“指称”和“实质性”的术语上构成了重大区别。前者诉诸于已经具有情感能力的事物,而后者则通过特殊的象征性机制在情境中创造情感体验的方式来实现。乔森(Johansen)倾向于解释艺术所施加的情感而又不离开符号学的观点,因而倾向于“指涉”类型的解释。根据隐喻理论的讨论和罗伯特·威特金的艺术社会学理论,证明了“指称”解释不足。克服对情感参与的“指称”解释的垄断,尤其是在文学中,意味着要摆脱推理的方式,对“其他”进行无休止的引用,以已经存在的有意义的事物为前提,从而分享其影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号