首页> 外文期刊>Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science >Perils and Potentials in Qualitative Psychology
【24h】

Perils and Potentials in Qualitative Psychology

机译:定性心理学的风险与潜力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Famously, Ebbinghaus declared that psychology has a long past, but only a short history. Psychology, as something implicit to human conduct, is as old as the human race, but the science, as an explicit investigative reflection upon that conduct, is a recent invention. Within the short history of psychology, we find an even shorter history of qualitative psychology specifically. Although most founding fathers (Freud, Piaget, Bartlett etc.) worked as “qualitative psychologists”, they found no need to thematize their methods of inquiry in this manner. Since around 1980, however, a field has established itself that can be called qualitative psychology. In this paper, I discuss how this field can move sensibly into the future, and I highlight two perils and two potentials. The perils stem from neo-positivism and a threatening “McDonaldization” of qualitative research, while the potentials are related to proliferation of new forms of inquiry and a transcending of disciplinary boundaries.
机译:著名的是,埃宾豪斯(Ebbinghaus)宣布心理学有很长的历史,但历史很短。心理学作为人类行为的隐含东西,与人类一样古老,但是科学作为对人类行为的明确调查反思,却是最近才发明的。在短暂的心理学史内,我们发现专门定性心理学的历史更短。尽管大多数开国元勋(弗洛伊德,皮亚杰,巴特利特等)都是“定性心理学家”,但他们发现并不需要以这种方式使他们的探究方法主题化。但是,自1980年前后以来,已经建立了一个可以称为定性心理学的领域。在本文中,我讨论了该领域如何明智地迈向未来,并重点介绍了两个风险和两个潜力。危险源于新实证主义和定性研究的威胁性“麦当劳化”,而其潜力则与新形式的探究的扩散和学科界限的超越有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号