...
首页> 外文期刊>Institutional investor >The Times They Are A-Changin'
【24h】

The Times They Are A-Changin'

机译:他们是时代的改变

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There is little doubt that hedge fund performance has waned in the past few years. From 1996 through 2000, Chicago-based Hedge Fund Research's HFRI fund weighted composite index was up a cumulative 76.78 percent net of fees. From 2001 through the third quarter of 2005, it rose 39.11 percent. Even though hedge funds outperformed the Standard & Poor's 500 index by about 8.4 percentage points per year over the past five years after lagging the S&P from 1996 through 2000, the fact remains that annual hedge fund returns have essentially been cut in half, to about 8 percent. The most common explanations for the recent mediocrity are that too many hedge funds are chasing the same oppor- tunities, investors are pumping too much money into hedge funds, and managers are taking less risk in response to investor demands for smoother returns. But the real reason that hedge funds have failed to deliver has been the lack of market volatility.
机译:毫无疑问,过去几年对冲基金的表现有所下降。从1996年到2000年,总部位于芝加哥的对冲基金研究公司(Hedge Fund Research)的HFRI基金加权综合指数扣除费用后累计上涨了76.78%。从2001年到2005年第三季度,它增长了39.11%。尽管对冲基金在1996至2000年落后于标准普尔之后的过去五年中,每年以超过标准普尔500指数的速度每年上涨约8.4个百分点,但事实仍然是,对冲基金的年收益率实际上已减少了一半,降至约8。百分。近期平庸的最常见解释是,太多的对冲基金追求相同的机会,投资者向对冲基金注入了太多资金,而管理人员为响应投资者对更平稳回报的要求而承担的风险也较小。但是,对冲基金未能交付的真正原因是缺乏市场动荡。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Institutional investor 》 |2005年第novadec期| p.60| 共1页
  • 作者

    Peter Borish;

  • 作者单位

    Twinfields Capital Management;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 f;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号