首页> 外文期刊>Inquiry >Nietzsche on creating and discovering values
【24h】

Nietzsche on creating and discovering values

机译:尼采创造和发现价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article considers Friedrich Nietzsche's claims about value creation alongside his proclamation that 'nature is always value-less' (GS 301), assessing their implications for his metaethics. It begins by weighing the evidence for a recent constructivist interpretation of Nietzsche's metaethics, arguing that despite several apparent interpretive advantages, Nietzschean constructivism ultimately fails. Through a close reading of GS 301 and related passages, the constructivist interpretation is shown to be misguided in taking Nietzsche's talk of value creation as expressing (or playing a significant role in) a metaethical view according to which the evaluative attitudes of philosophers ground what is valuable. Against this, it is argued that GS 301 should be understood as an assertion of the status of philosophers as the causal sources of new evaluative outlooks that shape the held values of their respective cultures, a claim developed through analysis of passages in which Nietzsche discusses his ideal of the 'genuine philosopher' and contrasts this figure with 'critics' or 'philosophical laborers' (BGE 210-211). It is next argued that, insofar as it is best understood as describing a social or anthropological phenomenon rather than a metaphysical one, GS 301 is a poor piece of evidence not only for the constructivist interpretation, but in fact for any account of Nietzsche's metaethical position-including radical anti-realist interpretations informed by his statement that 'nature is always value-less'. The paper then concludes by appealing to another passage, GS 55, which hints towards a very different-and plausibly realist-picture of Nietzsche's metaethics
机译:本文考虑了弗里德里希·尼采(Friedrich Nietzsche)关于价值创造的主张,以及他宣称“自然永远没有价值”(GS 301),并评估了它们对他的元伦理学的影响。它首先权衡了对尼采的元伦理学最近的建构主义解释的证据,认为尽管尼采的建构主义有几个明显的解释优势,但它最终还是失败了。通过仔细阅读GS 301及其相关段落,我们发现建构主义的解释被误导为以尼采的价值创造论作为表达(或在其中)发挥了元伦理学观点的依据,在这一观点中,哲学家的评价态度奠定了什么基础。有价值。与此相反,有人认为应将GS 301理解为主张哲学家地位的主张,因为哲学是塑造各自文化所持有价值的新评价观的因果源,这一主张是通过对尼采讨论其观点的文章进行分析得出的。真正的哲学家”的理想选择,并将其与“批评家”或“哲学工作者”进行对比(BGE 210-211)。接下来的论点是,就最好地理解它是描述一种社会或人类学现象而不是形而上学的现象而言,GS 301不仅是对建构主义解释的不充分证据,而且实际上是对尼采的超伦理立场的任何解释。 -包括激进的反现实主义解释,这些解释来自他的陈述,即“自然永远是无价值的”。然后,本文通过引用另一篇文章GS 55作为结尾,该文章暗示了尼采的元伦理学截然不同且真实的现实主义图景。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号