首页> 外文期刊>Inquiry >The 'I's Have it: Nietzsche on Subjectivity
【24h】

The 'I's Have it: Nietzsche on Subjectivity

机译:“我拥有它:尼采的主观性”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper identifies recent attributions to Nietzsche of skeptical arguments about the subject in its theoretical and practical capacities and argues that they are wrong. Although Nietzsche does criticize the picture of the subject as a unity that exerts influence in the world from outside it, he does so in order to replace it with a richer, more complex model of subjectivity. The skeptical arguments attributed to Nietzsche attempt to assimilate features of subjectivity to some alternative, purportedly more familiar explanatory account, and then move from this assimilation to the denial of subjectivity altogether. There are three main strategies for making this latter move, which are referred to in this paper as appeal to ontology, appeal to justification, and appeal to explanation. Each fails for different reasons, but all misconstrue Nietzsche's explanatory interests regarding subjectivity. Those interests, this paper argues, are what lead Nietzsche to argue that a single person comprises a multiplicity of subjectivities, and that all explanation is ultimately telic in form. This paper then discusses some of the appeals that Nietzsche makes to account for the possibility of single, unitary subjectivity within this framework, including: his account of the relationship between constituent and corporate units within fully self-relating subjectivity, his account of the relation between "inner" and "outer", his account of pluralist individualism, and his account of unconscious "depth". This paper concludes by arguing that Nietzsche's distinctive approach suggests a way to relate theoretical questions about the mental to practical questions about the self and ethical commitment.
机译:本文从理论和实践角度确定了对尼采的怀疑论点的最新归因,并指出它们是错误的。尽管尼采的确批评了这个主题的整体,认为它是一个从外部影响世界的整体,但他这样做是为了用一个更丰富,更复杂的主观模型代替它。归因于尼采的怀疑论证试图将主观性的特征同化为另一种据称更为熟悉的解释性解释,然后从这种同化转变为对主观性的否定。采取后一种方法的主要策略有三种,在本文中称为对本体的吸引力,对称义的吸引力和对解释的吸引力。每种失败都有不同的原因,但是所有这些都误解了尼采对主观性的解释性兴趣。本文认为,这些利益正是导致尼采认为一个人包括多种主观性的原因,所有解释最终都是形式上的。然后,本文讨论了尼采提出的在此框架内考虑单一统一主体性的可能性的一些呼吁,包括:他对完全自相关主观性内的组成与公司部门之间的关系的说明,他对之间的关​​系的说明。 “内部”和“外部”,他对多元个人主义的描述,以及对无意识的“深度”的描述。本文的结论是,尼采的独特方法提出了一种将有关心理的理论问题与有关自我和道德承诺的实际问题联系起来的方法。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Inquiry》 |2006年第3期|p.218-241|共24页
  • 作者

    ROBERT GUAY;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Philosophy, Binghamton University, P.O. Box 6000 Binghamton, NY 13902, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学、宗教;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:21:32

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号