...
首页> 外文期刊>InfoWorld >Where Do We Go From Here?
【24h】

Where Do We Go From Here?

机译:我们从这里去哪里?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

It looks like oracle/peoplesoft is a done deal. But why would Larry Ellison spend $10.3 billion for overlapping technology? For me, the answer comes in two parts. In the short term, Oracle wants PeopleSoft's customer-support business. Trolling for new licensees is expensive, but servicing current users is a high-margin endeavor. If you talk to Josh Greenbaum, an analyst at Enterprise Applications Consultants, he'll tell you support' of PeopleSoft." In other words, migration services. Siddiqui believes third parties will also offer support services for unsupported PeopleSoft applications. "You can almost think of mini-replicas of PeopleSoft being formed in the next two or three years by PeopleSoft junkies." Support is one thing, but what Oracle has not promised is to continue R&D for PeopleSoft products beyond the next release. So although all the Oracle needed this acquisition badly. Almost all of the application vendors get one-third of their revenue from maintenance, one-third from service, and one-third from new licenses, Greenbaum says, adding, "The real money is in the installed base, and you need that critical mass to keep that rolling."
机译:看来oracle / peoplesoft已经完成。但是,为什么拉里·埃里森会花费103亿美元用于技术重叠呢?对我来说,答案分为两部分。在短期内,甲骨文希望获得PeopleSoft的客户支持业务。寻找新的被许可方很昂贵,但是为当前用户提供服务是一项高利润的工作。如果您与Enterprise Applications Consultants的分析师Josh Greenbaum交谈,他会告诉您对PeopleSoft的支持。“换句话说,迁移服务。Siddiqui相信第三方也将为不受支持的PeopleSoft应用程序提供支持服务。”您几乎可以想一想在接下来的两到三年内由PeopleSoft的拥护者形成的PeopleSoft的微型副本。”支持是一回事,但是Oracle没有承诺在下一个发行版之后继续进行PeopleSoft产品的研发。因此,尽管所有Oracle都需要Greenbaum表示,几乎所有应用程序供应商的收入都来自维护,三分之一来自服务,三分之一来自新许可证,三分之一来自新许可证。他补充说:“真正的钱来自于安装基础,您需要足够的临界量来保持滚动。”

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号