首页> 外文期刊>Information Systems Research >Differences are Different: Examining the Effects of Communication Media on the Impacts of Racial and Gender Diversity in Decision-Making Teams
【24h】

Differences are Different: Examining the Effects of Communication Media on the Impacts of Racial and Gender Diversity in Decision-Making Teams

机译:差异是不同的:在决策团队中研究传播媒体对种族和性别多样性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Diversity can have positive and negative effects on team decision making. Text communication has been put forth as one solution to addressing this duality of team diversity. Unfortunately, the empirical results have been far from conclusive. We believe that resolving such inconsistencies is crucial to developing a more complete understanding of the use of communication technologies. To accomplish this, we developed a research model based on media synchronicity theory. We empirically tested this model by conducting a laboratory experiment with 46 teams, consisting primarily of men and women self-identified as Caucasians and Asians, performing a decision-making task. The results show that the type of diversity matters. Text communication improved knowledge sharing (i.e., conveyance) and knowledge integration (i.e., convergence) in racially diverse teams but impaired both in gender diverse teams. Knowledge integration was more important to decision quality when racial and gender diverse teams used text communication (but the importance of knowledge sharing was not affected by the communication medium).
机译:多样性会对团队决策产生正面和负面影响。文本通信已被提出来解决团队多样性的双重性。不幸的是,经验结果远非结论性的。我们认为,解决此类不一致问题对于更全面地了解通信技术的使用至关重要。为此,我们开发了基于媒体同步性理论的研究模型。我们通过与46个团队进行实验室实验,对该模型进行了实证测试,这些团队主要由自称是高加索人和亚洲人的男性和女性组成,执行决策任务。结果表明多样性的类型很重要。文字交流改善了种族多样化团队中的知识共享(即传递)和知识整合(即融合),但在性别多样化团队中都受到了损害。当种族和性别多样化的团队使用文本交流时,知识整合对于决策质量更为重要(但知识共享的重要性不受传播媒介的影响)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号