...
首页> 外文期刊>Information Systems Research >All Are Not Equal: An Examination of the Economic Returns to Different Forms of Participation in Open Source Software Communities
【24h】

All Are Not Equal: An Examination of the Economic Returns to Different Forms of Participation in Open Source Software Communities

机译:所有人都不平等:对开源软件社区不同形式参与的经济回报的考察

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Open source software (OSS) communities live and die with the continuous contributions of programmers who often participate without direct remuneration. An intriguing question is whether such sustained participation in OSS projects yields economic benefits to the participants. Moreover, as participants engage in OSS projects, they take on different roles and activities in the community. This raises additional questions of whether different forms of participation in OSS communities are associated with different economic rewards and, if so, in which contexts. In this paper, we draw upon theories of signaling and job matching to hypothesize that participants who possess "proof" of their skills in OSS projects are financially rewarded for their activities in the labor market. More specifically, we distinguish between participation in OSS communities that is associated with a signaling value for unobserved productivity characteristics and an additional value that accrues to participants whose OSS roles and activities match those in their paid employment. Following a cohort of OSS programmers over a six-year period, we empirically examine the wages and OSS performance of participants in three of the foremost OSS projects operating within the Apache Software Foundation. Controlling for individual characteristics and other wage-related factors, our findings reveal that credentials earned through a merit-based ranking system are associated with as much as an 18% increase in wages. Moreover, we find that participants who have OSS project management responsibilities receive additional financial rewards if their professional job is in IT management. These findings suggest that rank within an OSS meritocracy is a credible and precise signal of participants' productive capacity and that participants' roles and activities in an OSS community have additional financial value when aligned with their paid employment.
机译:开源软件(OSS)社区在程序员不断贡献下生存和死亡,这些程序员通常没有直接报酬就参与其中。一个有趣的问题是,这种持续参与开放源码软件项目是否会给参与者带来经济利益。此外,当参与者参与OSS项目时,他们在社区中扮演着不同的角色和活动。这就提出了另外一个问题,即不同形式的参与OSS社区是否与不同的经济回报相关联,如果是,则在何种情况下。在本文中,我们利用信号传递和工作匹配的理论来假设拥有“证明”他们在OSS项目中的技能的参与者因其在劳动力市场上的活动而获得经济上的回报。更具体地说,我们将OSS社区的参与与未被观察到的生产率特征的信号值相关联,并将OSS角色和活动与他们的有酬就业相匹配的参与者获得额外的价值。在六年的OSS程序员队伍之后,我们根据经验检查了Apache Software Foundation中三个最重要的OSS项目中参与者的工资和OSS绩效。控制个人特征和其他与工资相关的因素,我们的发现表明,通过基于绩效的排名系统获得的证书与工资增长多达18%相关。此外,我们发现,承担OSS项目管理职责的参与者如果他们的专业工作是IT管理,则可以获得额外的经济奖励。这些发现表明,在OSS精英管理体系中的排名是参与者生产能力的可靠且精确的信号,并且参与者在OSS社区中的角色和活动与他们的有薪就业保持一致,具有额外的财务价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号