...
首页> 外文期刊>Information Systems Research >Leader Influence on Sustained Participation in Online Collaborative Work Communities: A Simulation-Based Approach
【24h】

Leader Influence on Sustained Participation in Online Collaborative Work Communities: A Simulation-Based Approach

机译:领导者对持续参与在线协作工作社区的影响:基于模拟的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

From the perspective of leader-member exchange theory, we investigate how two forms of leadership style (uniform leader-member exchange (ULMX) and differential leader-member exchange (DLMX)) impact member participation in online collaborative work communities (OCWC). Furthermore, based on computer simulations, we also examine the moderating impact of key contextual factors on the relationship between leadership style and member contributions. Efficacy of leadership style in OCWCs is greatly influenced by environmental conditions. DLMX is more effective in sustaining member commitment under high environmental uncertainty, regardless of network size and structure. ULMX is more effective in decentralized structures and during the early stage of community growth. The simulation-based insights suggest that supervisory behavior does matter to member retention and sustained participation in OCWCs, but its impact is significantly moderated by many contextual factors, such as community size, structure, maturity, and environmental uncertainty. In certain situations ULMX prevails, but in others DLMX is more effective. These two forms of governance in fact complement each other, rather than being mutually exclusive forms of leadership style. To attain a maximal outcome, leaders should flexibly adapt their governance styles between DLMX and ULMX over the life cycle of an OCWC to maximize member retention and performance benefits.
机译:从领导者-成员交换理论的角度,我们研究了两种形式的领导方式(统一领导者-成员交换(ULMX)和差分领导者-成员交换(DLMX))如何影响成员对在线协作工作社区(OCWC)的参与。此外,基于计算机模拟,我们还研究了关键环境因素对领导风格和成员贡献之间关系的调节作用。 OCWC的领导风格的效率在很大程度上受到环境条件的影响。无论网络规模和结构如何,DLMX在高环境不确定性下更有效地维持成员的承诺。 ULMX在权力下放的结构中以及社区发展的早期阶段更为有效。基于模拟的见解表明,监督行为对于OCWC的成员保留和持续参与确实很重要,但是其影响明显受到许多环境因素的影响,例如社区规模,结构,成熟度和环境不确定性。在某些情况下,以ULMX为准,但在其他情况下,DLMX更有效。这两种治理形式实际上是相辅相成的,而不是相互排斥的领导方式。为了获得最大的结果,领导者应在OCWC的生命周期内灵活地在DLMX和ULMX之间调整其治理风格,以最大程度地保留成员并提高绩效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号