首页> 外文期刊>Information retrieval >Probabilistic models in IR and their relationships
【24h】

Probabilistic models in IR and their relationships

机译:IR中的概率模型及其关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A solid research path towards new information retrieval models is to further develop the theory behind existing models. A profound understanding of these models is therefore essential. In this paper, we revisit probability ranking principle (PRP)-based models, probability of relevance (PR) models, and language models, finding conceptual differences in their definition and interrelationships. The probabilistic model of the PRP has not been explicitly defined previously, but doing so leads to the formulation of two actual principles with different objectives. First, the belief probability ranking principle (BPRP), which considers uncertain relevance between known documents and the current query, and second, the popularity probability ranking principle (PPRP), which considers the probability of relevance of documents among multiple queries with the same features. Our analysis shows how some of the discussed PR models implement the BPRP or the PPRP while others do not. However, for some models the parameter estimation is challenging. Finally, language models are often presented as related to PR models. However, we find that language models differ from PR models in every aspect of a probabilistic model and the effectiveness of language models cannot be explained by the PRP.
机译:通往新信息检索模型的坚实研究路径是进一步发展现有模型背后的理论。因此,对这些模型的深刻理解至关重要。在本文中,我们将重新审视基于概率排名原理(PRP)的模型,相关概率(PR)模型和语言模型,并在它们的定义和相互关系中发现概念差异。 PRP的概率模型先前尚未明确定义,但这样做导致制定了具有不同目标的两个实际原则。首先是置信概率排名原则(BPRP),它考虑了已知文档与当前查询之间的不确定性关联;其次,是流行度概率排名原则(PPRP),它考虑了具有相同特征的多个查询之间文档的相关概率。我们的分析表明,某些已讨论的PR模型是如何实现BPRP或PPRP的,而另一些则没有。但是,对于某些模型,参数估计具有挑战性。最后,语言模型通常与PR模型相关。但是,我们发现语言模型在概率模型的每个方面都与PR模型不同,并且PRP无法解释语言模型的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号