首页> 外文期刊>Information Resources Management Journal >A Review of IS Research Activities and Outputs Using Pro Forma Abstracts
【24h】

A Review of IS Research Activities and Outputs Using Pro Forma Abstracts

机译:使用形式摘要对信息系统研究活动和产出的回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Using March and Smith s taxonomy of information systems (IS) research activities and outputs and Newman's method of pro forma abstracting, this research mapped the current space of IS research and identified research activities and outputs that have received very little or no attention in the top IS publishing outlets. We reviewed and classified 1,157 articles published in some of the top IS journals and the ICIS proceedings for the period 1998-2002. The results demonstrate the efficacy of March and Smith s (1995) taxonomy for summarizing the state of IS research and for identifying activity-output categories that have received little or no attention. Examples of published research occupying cells of the taxonomy are cited, and research is posited to populate the one empty cell. The results also affirm the need to balance theorizing with building and evaluating systems because the latter two provide unique feedback that encourage those theories that are the most promising in practice.
机译:本研究使用March和Smith的信息系统(IS)研究活动和输出分类法以及纽曼的形式摘要方法,绘制了IS研究的当前空间,并确定了很少或根本没有受到关注的研究活动和输出。 IS发行网点。我们对1998-2002年间在一些IS顶级期刊和ICIS会议录中发表的1,157篇文章进行了分类。结果表明,March and Smith(1995)分类法在总结信息系统研究的状态以及识别很少或根本没有受到关注的活动-产出类别方面的功效。引用了已发表的占据分类法细胞的研究的例子,并提出了将一个空细胞填入研究的假设。结果还肯定了在理论构建与评估体系之间取得平衡的必要性,因为后两者提供了独特的反馈,从而鼓励了那些在实践中最有前途的理论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号