首页> 外文期刊>Information & Management >Between online and offline markets: A structural estimation of consumer demand
【24h】

Between online and offline markets: A structural estimation of consumer demand

机译:在线和离线市场之间:消费需求的结构估算

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

While the literature on comparing the online and offline markets from the supply-side perspective is extensive, fewer researches have focused on the demand-side. Using a large-scale point-of-sales (POS) dataset on consumer packaged goods, we estimate a structural demand model and conducted counterfactuals of the price change or product stockouts. Our key findings are: 1) the own-price elasticity of demand is higher offline (i.e., ?1.74 on average) than online (i.e., ?0.87 on average). 2) The cross-price elasticity is also higher offline (i.e., 0.17 on average) than online (i.e., 0.04 on average). 3) When a product is out-of-stock, a larger portion of the loss of the market share is recovered more in the common products in the offline markets than that in the online markets. Specifically, 6.55 % of the loss of the market share goes to common products offline on average, while 6.05 % of the loss of the market share goes to the common product online on average. Our further analyses show that, when considering substitute products, the impact of price increases is surprising. The retailer may not be worse off by increasing prices because the gains in the revenue from the substitute products can make up more than the losses. The manufacturers may lose revenue by increasing prices or product stockouts. However, consumers are hurt more in the offline markets following the price increases of the common products because the offline market is more concentrated on the common products.
机译:虽然从供应方角度来看的在线和离线市场的文献广泛,但研究的重点是需求方的更少。在消费者包装商品上使用大规模的销售点(POS)数据集,我们估计了结构性需求模型,并进行了价格变化或产品存货的反应性。我们的主要研究结果是:1)需求的自身价格弹性较高(即平均)的离线较高(即,均为1.74)(即平均平均值0.87)。 2)交叉价格弹性也比在线上更高(即0.17,平均平均0.04)。 3)当产品犯下库存时,在离线市场的普通产品中,市场份额的较大部分比在线市场中的普通产品更加恢复。具体而言,6.55%的市场份额损失平均普通产品,而平均市场份额的6.05%的损失率平均进入普通产品。我们的进一步分析表明,在考虑替代产品时,价格上涨的影响令人惊讶。由于替代产品的收入收入可以弥补损失,因此零售商可能不会越来越糟糕。制造商可能会通过增加价格或产品存货减少收入。然而,由于离线市场更集中在普通产品上,消费者在离线市场中受到更多的伤害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号